Asus P8P67 PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics24.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive63.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardAsus P8P67 PRO  (all builds)
Memory2.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display4096 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120217
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateFeb 10 '19 at 23:23
Run Duration155 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
85.2% Excellent
Memory 95.9
1-Core 109
2-Core 210
80% 138 Pts
4-Core 437
8-Core 406
57% 422 Pts
64-Core 427
26% 427 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 85.2%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-Ti-$362
Asus(1043 841E) 2GB
CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 417.35
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
24.4% Poor
Lighting 29.5
Reflection 28.2
Parallax 36.1
24% 31.3 fps
MRender 35.5
Gravity 36.2
Splatting 23.4
25% 31.7 fps
Poor: 23%
This bench: 24.4%
Great: 29%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra Plus 256GB-$139
21GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X211200
SusWrite @10s intervals: 145 76 73 65 75 63 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
63.3% Good
Read 433
Write 263
Mixed 104
SusWrite 83
48% 221 MB/s
4K Read 21.6
4K Write 71.9
4K Mixed 23.9
101% 39.1 MB/s
DQ Read 311
DQ Write 151
DQ Mixed 108
113% 190 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 63.3%
Great: 99%
Seagate Barracuda Pro 10TB (2016)-$191
3.5TB free
Firmware: DN01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 175 167 172 175 175 174 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 47% Great: 111%
Samsung Spinpoint F1 1TB-$100
70GB free
Firmware: 1AA01109
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 60 59 60 60 60 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
38.4% Below average
Read 72.8
Write 44.5
Mixed 54.7
SusWrite 60.5
43% 58.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.7
156% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 38.4%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905403-185.A00LF 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
61.2% Good
MC Read 20.7
MC Write 22.2
MC Mixed 19.3
59% 20.7 GB/s
SC Read 17
SC Write 19.7
SC Mixed 20
54% 18.9 GB/s
Latency 54.4
74% 54.4 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 61.2%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8P67 PRO Builds (Compare 1,049 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus P8P67 PRO - $230

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $849
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback