Lenovo 20255

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 32%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 32.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2.36% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive46.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (62%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemLenovo 20255  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO Lenovo G505s
Memory11.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20130423
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateJan 29 '19 at 11:21
Run Duration167 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU 62%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-5550M APU-$80
Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
32.3% Below average
Memory 52.4
1-Core 23.7
2-Core 45.6
28% 40.6 Pts
4-Core 73
8-Core 72.8
10% 72.9 Pts
64-Core 72.7
4% 72.7 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 32.3%
Great: 51%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 8550G + 8570M Dual Graphics
Legend(17AA 3804) 768MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 12.102.1.8000
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
2.36% Terrible
Lighting 2.63
Reflection 4.31
Parallax 2.19
2% 3.04 fps
MRender 0.38
Gravity 2.87
Splatting 5.74
3% 3 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.36%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
183GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK
SusWrite @10s intervals: 226 124 133 134 168 208 MB/s
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
46.1% Average
Read 176
Write 111
Mixed 271
SusWrite 165
41% 181 MB/s
4K Read 19.1
4K Write 32.7
4K Mixed 20
72% 23.9 MB/s
DQ Read 183
DQ Write 126
DQ Mixed 151
113% 153 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 46.1%
Great: 100%
Seagate ST1000LM048-2E7172 1TB
508GB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 125 133 132 120 127 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
72.6% Very good
Read 125
Write 116
Mixed 74.9
SusWrite 128
81% 111 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
199% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 72.6%
Great: 71%
JMicron Tech 1TB
20GB free, PID 0578
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 24 24 26 23 27 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
9.46% Terrible
Read 19.4
Write 16.5
Mixed 12.7
SusWrite 23.1
24% 17.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.2
25% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 9.46%
Great: 174%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B1G73QH0-YK0 HMT41GS6AFR8A-PB 16GB
800, 800 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
16.6% Very poor
MC Read 7.6
MC Write 3.3
MC Mixed 5.8
16% 5.57 GB/s
SC Read 4.4
SC Write 3.2
SC Mixed 5.3
12% 4.3 GB/s
Latency 152
26% 152 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 16.6%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 20255 Builds (Compare 78 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20255

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 22% - Poor Total price: $28
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback