MSI FM2-A85XA-G65 (MS-7793)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics5.44% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive62.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
7 years ago, 7 years ago.
SystemMSI MS-7793
MotherboardMSI FM2-A85XA-G65 (MS-7793)  (all builds)
Memory4.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20131202
Uptime1.5 Days
Run DateJul 26 '16 at 13:30
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-5800K APU (2012 D.Tr)-$119
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
56.1% Above average
Memory 78.7
1-Core 66.9
2-Core 124
55% 89.8 Pts
4-Core 195
8-Core 199
26% 197 Pts
64-Core 200
12% 200 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 56.1%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7660D
MSI(1462 7793) 768MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.947.0.0
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
5.44% Terrible
Lighting 6.97
Reflection 7.85
Parallax 7.12
6% 7.31 fps
MRender 4.43
Gravity 6.23
Splatting 7.09
5% 5.92 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.44%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 120GB-$109
58GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXT0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
62.6% Good
Read 492
Write 133
Mixed 77.2
50% 234 MB/s
4K Read 26
4K Write 79.5
4K Mixed 10.2
95% 38.6 MB/s
DQ Read 234
DQ Write 130
DQ Mixed 26.6
61% 130 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 62.6%
Great: 73%
WD Red 2TB (2012)-$82
913GB free
Firmware: 82.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
86.8% Excellent
Read 186
Write 116
Mixed 127
108% 143 MB/s
4K Read 0.86
4K Write 2.27
4K Mixed 0.29
110% 1.14 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 86.8%
Great: 86%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F3-10666CL7-2GBRH F3-10666CL7-2GBRH F3-10666CL7-2GBRH F3-10666CL7-2GBRH 8GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
31.3% Below average
MC Read 14.9
MC Write 6.2
MC Mixed 10.7
30% 10.6 GB/s
SC Read 7.8
SC Write 6.3
SC Mixed 9.6
23% 7.9 GB/s
Latency 83.1
48% 83.1 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 31.3%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical FM2-A85XA-G65 (MS-7793) Builds (Compare 15 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI FM2-A85XA-G65 (MS-7793) - $167

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 42% - Average Total price: $710
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback