Asus CM6630_CM6730_CM6830.

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive64% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAsus CM6630_CM6730_CM6830.  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK CM6630_CM6730_CM6830.
Memory3.5 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110428
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 19 '19 at 13:17
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2310-$90
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
72.8% Very good
Memory 91
1-Core 80.5
2-Core 143
65% 105 Pts
4-Core 317
8-Core 314
42% 316 Pts
64-Core 316
20% 316 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 72.8%
Great: 72%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata Ultimate SU800 128GB-$30
85GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P0801C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 231 236 234 234 236 234 MB/s
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
64% Good
Read 252
Write 242
Mixed 218
SusWrite 234
53% 237 MB/s
4K Read 22.5
4K Write 58
4K Mixed 30.5
104% 37 MB/s
DQ Read 129
DQ Write 197
DQ Mixed 157
121% 161 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 64%
Great: 107%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.11 1.5TB-$88
1TB free
Firmware: CC4H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 108 108 108 108 108 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
60.5% Good
Read 104
Write 100
Mixed 57.3
SusWrite 107
68% 92.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
140% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 60.5%
Great: 70%
HP Desktop HD BD07 2TB
1.5TB free, PID bd07
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 28 29 29 29 29 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
17.8% Very poor
Read 33.7
Write 28.5
Mixed 25.3
SusWrite 28.6
39% 29 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.7
98% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 17.8%
Great: 46%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Nanya NT4GC64B8HB0NF-CG 6GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 2048 MB
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
51.6% Above average
MC Read 18.4
MC Write 18.9
MC Mixed 16.1
51% 17.8 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 14.9
SC Mixed 14.4
42% 14.5 GB/s
Latency 65.7
61% 65.7 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 51.6%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical CM6630_CM6730_CM6830. Builds (Compare 539 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Asus CM6630_CM6730_CM6830.

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $165
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback