Asrock N68-GS4 FX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (10th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 90 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics26.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive52% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsrock N68-GS4 FX  (all builds)
Memory6.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20150408
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 16 '19 at 14:33
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-4300-$73
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
42.5% Average
Memory 72.7
1-Core 24.8
2-Core 45.1
35% 47.5 Pts
4-Core 74.8
8-Core 73.2
10% 74 Pts
64-Core 73.6
5% 73.6 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 42.5%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
CLim: 1268 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 18.12.2
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
26.8% Poor
Lighting 20.3
Reflection 43.6
Parallax 65.5
16% 43.1 fps
MRender 64.3
Gravity 55.3
Splatting 53.4
47% 57.7 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 26.8%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 EVO 500GB
293GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 148 186 160 205 203 195 MB/s
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
52% Above average
Read 227
Write 198
Mixed 199
SusWrite 183
45% 202 MB/s
4K Read 23.5
4K Write 39.9
4K Mixed 27.9
92% 30.4 MB/s
DQ Read 39.8
DQ Write 90
DQ Mixed 53.2
44% 61 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 52%
Great: 79%
Seagate ST3750528AS 750GB-$65
689GB free
Firmware: CC44
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 94 88 103 100 97 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
39.4% Below average
Read 40.8
Write 40.3
Mixed 40
SusWrite 96.1
40% 54.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 1
168% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 39.4%
Great: 65%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5584-005.A00LF 99U5584-014.A00LF 8GB
1066, 1066 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
26.9% Poor
MC Read 10.9
MC Write 6.5
MC Mixed 10.5
27% 9.3 GB/s
SC Read 6.2
SC Write 4.4
SC Mixed 7.2
17% 5.93 GB/s
Latency 95.3
42% 95.3 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 26.9%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical N68-GS4 FX Builds (Compare 93 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock N68-GS4 FX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $210
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback