Lenovo 10MR004HUS

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Lenovo 10MR004HUS (all builds)
Motherboard	LENOVO 3111
Memory	1.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170413
Uptime	15.8 Days
Run Date	Jan 14 '19 at 18:50
Run Duration	200 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	28%

PC Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-6500T 9,313 User benchmarks, average bench 61% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	46.2% Average	Memory 65.7 1-Core 90.9 2-Core 76.9 51% 77.8 Pts	4-Core 152 8-Core 182 22% 167 Pts	64-Core 197 12% 197 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 46.2% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Desktop Skylake) 188,220 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Legend(17AA 3111) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 23.20.16.4973 Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		Lighting 6.53 Reflection 8.88 Parallax 6.41 5% 7.27 fps	Splatting 11 11% 11 fps
Poor: 3% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLW128HEGR-000L1 128GB 2,374 User benchmarks, average bench 169% 26GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2L1QCXB7 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 956 Write 582 Mixed 365 139% 634 MB/s	4K Read 8 4K Write 28.2 4K Mixed 19.9 53% 18.7 MB/s	DQ Read 44 DQ Write 98 DQ Mixed 55.7 47% 65.9 MB/s
Poor: 93% Great: 213%
Seagate Expansion 2TB 49,966 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 2TB free Firmware: 0708 SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 120 128 123 122 123 MB/s Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	65.4% Good	Read 104 Write 123 Mixed 94.7 SusWrite 124 82% 111 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 3.1 4K Mixed 0.7 181% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 65.4% Great: 67%
SanDisk Cruzer Fit 32GB 4,876 User benchmarks, average bench 9% 26GB free, PID 5571 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.3 3.9 4.7 4.6 4.6 4.8 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	6.12% Terrible	Read 19 Write 14 Mixed 14.9 SusWrite 4.6 17% 13.1 MB/s	4K Read 2.2 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.4 42% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 6.12% Great: 14%
ST320LT0 07-9ZV142 320GB 13 User benchmarks, average bench 13% 180GB free, PID 0c31 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 31 31 32 32 32 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	10.7% Very poor	Read 19.8 Write 26.7 Mixed 15.8 SusWrite 31.7 33% 23.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.1 4K Write 0.3 4K Mixed 0.2 17% 0.2 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 10.7% Great: 17%
Lexar USB Flash Drive 32GB 1,935 User benchmarks, average bench 7% 30GB free, PID c75c Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.8 5.9 6 5.4 5.5 6 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	4.54% Terrible	Read 17.2 Write 3.7 Mixed 6.8 SusWrite 5.7 9% 8.35 MB/s	4K Read 3.4 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 13% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 4.54% Great: 11%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CRC 1x8GB 122,420 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	26.1% Poor	MC Read 9.2 MC Write 9.4 MC Mixed 8.8 26% 9.13 GB/s	SC Read 4.8 SC Write 6.3 SC Mixed 6.9 17% 6 GB/s	Latency 112 36% 112 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 26.1% Great: 43%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 10MR004HUS Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 12%

Tree trunk

Desktop 65%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 11%

Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 10MR004HUS

CPU
Core i5-6500TIntelBench 61%, 9,313 samples	2x

GPU
HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 188,220 samples	2x

SSD
CT4000P3SSD8 4TBBench 295%, 2,934 samples	1x

RAM
HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CRC 16GBHynixBench 70%, 3,373 samples	1x
M471A1K43CB1-CRC 1x8GBSamsungBench 37%, 122,420 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16