bin bin

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics34.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive40.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
System
MotherboardIntel DH55TC
Memory6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110422
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 04 '19 at 02:16
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 34%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon X3450
XU1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
69.6% Good
Memory 97
1-Core 77.6
2-Core 160
68% 111 Pts
4-Core 230
8-Core 406
38% 318 Pts
64-Core 405
25% 405 Pts
Poor: 55%
This bench: 69.6%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
PNY(196E 11C3) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 399.24
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
34.3% Below average
Lighting 43.5
Reflection 32.2
Parallax 39.2
36% 38.3 fps
MRender 38.9
Gravity 40.8
Splatting 37.9
32% 39.2 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 34.3%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Spcc Solid State Disk 128GB
94GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM91.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 222 219 215 219 219 219 MB/s
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
40.9% Average
Read 189
Write 151
Mixed 136
SusWrite 219
39% 173 MB/s
4K Read 17.1
4K Write 31.4
4K Mixed 14.9
62% 21.1 MB/s
DQ Read 19.7
DQ Write 38.1
DQ Mixed 18.7
17% 25.5 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 40.9%
Great: 93%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$24
465GB free
Firmware: KC48
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 122 121 123 123 122 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
69.2% Good
Read 120
Write 117
Mixed 52.4
SusWrite 122
75% 103 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.9
151% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 69.2%
Great: 88%
SanDisk Cruzer Glide 128GB
12GB free, PID 5575
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.4 5.6 2.3 5.2 2.2 4.7 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
7.06% Terrible
Read 13.3
Write 7.2
Mixed 10
SusWrite 3.7
11% 8.55 MB/s
4K Read 2.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 1.5
102% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 7.06%
Great: 16%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown M378B5673FH0-CF8 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1066 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
43% Average
MC Read 16
MC Write 14.2
MC Mixed 11.9
40% 14 GB/s
SC Read 9.9
SC Write 11.6
SC Mixed 12.8
33% 11.4 GB/s
Latency 50.4
79% 50.4 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 43%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,280 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback