Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive41.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemGigabyte A320M-S2H
MotherboardGigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF  (all builds)
Memory13.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181206
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 13 '18 at 01:40
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 1600-$110
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
74.2% Very good
Memory 72.2
1-Core 104
2-Core 208
71% 128 Pts
4-Core 410
8-Core 677
66% 543 Pts
64-Core 845
52% 845 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 74.2%
Great: 78%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$26
32GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK71E0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 220 12 39 88 24 17 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
41.8% Average
Read 351
Write 37.2
Mixed 33.5
SusWrite 66.8
26% 122 MB/s
4K Read 22
4K Write 34.9
4K Mixed 16.5
73% 24.5 MB/s
DQ Read 36.3
DQ Write 42.3
DQ Mixed 38.3
29% 39 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 41.8%
Great: 85%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$28
421GB free
Firmware: MS2OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 153 146 153 147 152 157 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
86% Excellent
Read 149
Write 126
Mixed 30
SusWrite 151
82% 114 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.6
129% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 86%
Great: 107%
WD Blue 2.5" 320GB (2010)-$18
282GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 87 86 84 86 86 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
49.1% Average
Read 85.2
Write 82.8
Mixed 53.7
SusWrite 85.9
57% 76.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
119% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 49.1%
Great: 47%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX2133C14D4/8G 16GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
77.6% Very good
MC Read 29.5
MC Write 28.3
MC Mixed 26.1
80% 28 GB/s
SC Read 20.4
SC Write 28.6
SC Mixed 23
69% 24 GB/s
Latency 96.4
42% 96.4 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 77.6%
Great: 78%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-A320M-S2H-CF Builds (Compare 7,714 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF - $70

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Outstanding Total price: $413
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback