Asus Z87-A

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics35.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus Z87-A  (all builds)
Memory8.3 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140603
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 20 '18 at 07:07
Run Duration151 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4590-$188
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
78.9% Very good
Memory 88.5
1-Core 103
2-Core 206
76% 132 Pts
4-Core 403
8-Core 397
54% 400 Pts
64-Core 401
25% 401 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 78.9%
Great: 73%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)-$15
Asus(1043 8534) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4835
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 3% Great: 3%
AMD R9 380-$200
CLim: 980 MHz, MLim: 1375 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 18.9.3
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
35.8% Below average
Lighting 45.6
Reflection 50.2
Parallax 53.2
37% 49.7 fps
MRender 48.6
Gravity 39.4
Splatting 36.2
33% 41.4 fps
Poor: 31%
This bench: 35.8%
Great: 35%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$39
223GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 122 149 146 135 130 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
92.2% Outstanding
Read 183
Write 165
Mixed 112
SusWrite 138
110% 150 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.2
238% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 92.2%
Great: 109%
Seagate ST31500541AS 1.5TB
829GB free
Firmware: CC34
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 84 85 89 84 88 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
50.9% Above average
Read 92
Write 91.5
Mixed 51
SusWrite 85.3
59% 79.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 1
174% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 50.9%
Great: 56%
Maxtor STM3500630AS 500GB
45GB free
Firmware: 3.AAE
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 63 63 64 62 64 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
35.5% Below average
Read 60.3
Write 62.7
Mixed 42.5
SusWrite 63.1
42% 57.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
136% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 35.5%
Great: 43%
WD My Book 1140 2TB
616GB free, PID 1140
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 111 102 102 110 111 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
44.1% Average
Read 102
Write 106
Mixed 76.5
SusWrite 105
132% 97.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
95% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 44.1%
Great: 49%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMZ8GX3M2A1866C9 0215 VS2GB1333D3 0215 CMZ8GX3M2A1866C9 0215 VS2GB1333D3 12GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 2048, 4096, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
61.6% Good
MC Read 21.9
MC Write 23.1
MC Mixed 19.9
62% 21.6 GB/s
SC Read 16.2
SC Write 18.8
SC Mixed 18.9
51% 18 GB/s
Latency 69.1
58% 69.1 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 61.6%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z87-A Builds (Compare 2,938 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 60%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 50%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus Z87-A - $299

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $773
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback