MSI Z97-G45 GAMING (MS-7821)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics36.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemMSI MS-7821
MotherboardMSI Z97-G45 GAMING (MS-7821)  (all builds)
Memory8.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150813
Uptime2 Days
Run DateNov 13 '18 at 11:47
Run Duration184 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790K-$348
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
77.9% Very good
Memory 86.6
1-Core 119
2-Core 223
81% 143 Pts
4-Core 374
8-Core 616
60% 495 Pts
64-Core 620
38% 620 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 77.9%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
CLim: 1544 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 416.81
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
36.7% Below average
Lighting 48.1
Reflection 46
Parallax 40.5
39% 44.9 fps
MRender 39.2
Gravity 41.7
Splatting 37.2
32% 39.4 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 36.7%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$90
22GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 494
Write 392
Mixed 356
92% 414 MB/s
4K Read 43.8
4K Write 121
4K Mixed 62.1
210% 75.6 MB/s
DQ Read 371
DQ Write 338
DQ Mixed 354
266% 355 MB/s
Poor: 80% Great: 134%
Toshiba MQ01ACF050 500GB-$150
210GB free
Firmware: AV001D
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 117 118 119 118 119 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
67.7% Good
Read 118
Write 117
Mixed 52
SusWrite 118
74% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
168% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 67.7%
Great: 69%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$68
1TB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 106 106 108 108 108 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
62.3% Good
Read 110
Write 103
Mixed 93.8
SusWrite 107
77% 103 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.7
156% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 62.3%
Great: 67%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$68
709GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 93 93 95 95 95 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
58.6% Above average
Read 110
Write 94
Mixed 76.2
SusWrite 93.5
69% 93.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.7
154% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 58.6%
Great: 67%
Generic STORAGE DEVICE 197GB
183GB free, PID 0743
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 44 45 43 42 43 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
35.3% Below average
Read 89.5
Write 67
Mixed 71.2
SusWrite 45
88% 68.2 MB/s
4K Read 7.6
4K Write 3.5
4K Mixed 4.4
297% 5.17 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 35.3%
Great: 35%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 2TB
1.5TB free, PID a200
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 38 38 38 38 38 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
18.8% Very poor
Read 37.7
Write 37.7
Mixed 24.3
SusWrite 38
46% 34.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.5
73% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 18.8%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
48% Average
MC Read 16.8
MC Write 17.4
MC Mixed 15.1
47% 16.4 GB/s
SC Read 11.6
SC Write 16.3
SC Mixed 14.3
40% 14.1 GB/s
Latency 70.8
56% 70.8 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 48%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z97-G45 GAMING (MS-7821) Builds (Compare 1,331 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: MSI Z97-G45 GAMING (MS-7821) - $152

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $800
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback