Biostar H61MLC2

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 24% Surfboard	Desktop 75% Battleship	Workstation 18% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	30.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Biostar H61MLC2 (all builds)
Memory	5.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1440 x 900 - 32 Bit cores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120911
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Nov 09 '18 at 16:22
Run Duration	143 Seconds
Run User	BRA-User
Background CPU	5%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3330 51,926 User benchmarks, average bench 61% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	74.2% Very good	Memory 91.4 1-Core 85.9 2-Core 154 67% 110 Pts	4-Core 331 8-Core 330 44% 331 Pts	64-Core 321 20% 321 Pts
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 74.2% Great: 69%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Nvidia(10DE 11BF) ≥ 4GB; gtx 1050 ti CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 416.81 Performing below potential (76^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	30.2% Below average	Lighting 37.5 Reflection 29.3 Parallax 36.3 31% 34.4 fps	MRender 37.7 Gravity 36.6 Splatting 34.3 29% 36.2 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 30.2% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Seagate ST1000VM002-1CT162 1TB 39,407 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 419GB free (System drive) Firmware: SC23 SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 78 106 117 123 122 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	60.2% Good	Read 104 Write 74.5 Mixed 37.5 SusWrite 106 59% 80.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.8 135% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 60.2% Great: 98%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$24 574,344 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 464GB free Firmware: KC65 SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 133 135 135 135 135 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	75.7% Very good	Read 130 Write 128 Mixed 54.3 SusWrite 134 82% 112 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.9 150% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 75.7% Great: 88%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 8GB 30,139 User benchmarks, average bench 10% 7GB free, PID 5567 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.4 3.5 3.9 3.8 3.9 3.9 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	9.27% Terrible	Read 25.3 Write 10.5 Mixed 14 SusWrite 3.7 16% 13.4 MB/s	4K Read 4.7 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 2.2 133% 2.7 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 9.27% Great: 13%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown SH564128FH8N0QHSCG 8GB 44 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	52.8% Above average	MC Read 18.5 MC Write 19.1 MC Mixed 17.1 52% 18.2 GB/s	SC Read 14.5 SC Write 14.8 SC Mixed 15.7 43% 15 GB/s	Latency 65.2 61% 65.2 ns
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 52.8% Great: 53%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H61MLC2 Builds (Compare 22 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 56%

Gunboat

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Biostar H61MLC2

CPU
Core i5-3330IntelBench 61%, 51,926 samples	6x
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	5x
Core i5-3570IntelBench 65%, 104,858 samples	3x

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	5x
GTX 950Nvidia $100Bench 26%, 111,509 samples	5x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	2x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	3x
L5 SSD 120GBTeamBench 66%, 501 samples	1x
240GB 240GBSSDBench 64%, 5,968 samples	1x

RAM
16JTF1G64AZ-1G6E1 1x8GBMicronBench 29%, 6,196 samples	3x
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	2x
99U5471-037.A00LF 1x8GBKingstonBench 31%, 2,407 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 22% - Poor

Total price: $28

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16