Emaxx EMX-A58FM2+HD-ICAFE

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 30%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (10th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 90 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 32.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2.15% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (98%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardEmaxx EMX-A58FM2+HD-ICAFE  (all builds)
Memory0.7 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20140813
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 03 '18 at 17:03
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU 98%

 PC Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A6-6400K APU-$81
P0, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
32.6% Below average
Memory 58.5
1-Core 23.5
2-Core 46.9
30% 43 Pts
4-Core 39.1
8-Core 76.1
7% 57.6 Pts
64-Core 97.1
6% 97.1 Pts
Poor: 22%
This bench: 32.6%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 8470D
AMD(1002 0123) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1065.0
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
2.15% Terrible
Lighting 2.63
Reflection 4.15
Parallax 0.66
2% 2.48 fps
MRender 2
Gravity 2.73
Splatting 3
2% 2.58 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.15%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Marshal MAL31000SA-T72 1TB
554GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MT5M
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 51 50 25 60 55 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
17.4% Very poor
Read 17
Write 4.8
Mixed 12.3
SusWrite 43.6
14% 19.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.1
23% 0.2 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 17.4%
Great: 89%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix DMT451E6AFR8C-PB 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
17.5% Very poor
MC Read 6.7
MC Write 4.8
MC Mixed 6.2
17% 5.9 GB/s
SC Read 3
SC Write 4.4
SC Mixed 4.7
12% 4.03 GB/s
Latency 132
30% 132 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 17.5%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EMX-A58FM2+HD-ICAFE Builds (Compare 20 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Emaxx EMX-A58FM2+HD-ICAFE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $51
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback