HP ProBook 6470b

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.82% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive46.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (36%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP ProBook 6470b  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 179B
Memory0.3 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150407
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 30 '18 at 20:35
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User CHL-User
Background CPU 36%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3320M-$199
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
51.5% Above average
Memory 78.2
1-Core 67.9
2-Core 101
53% 82.4 Pts
4-Core 141
8-Core 171
20% 156 Pts
64-Core 188
12% 188 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 51.5%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
HP(103C 179B) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4252
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
3.82% Terrible
Lighting 4.23
Reflection 5.77
Parallax 2.97
4% 4.32 fps
MRender 4.9
Gravity 2.43
Splatting 8.17
4% 5.17 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.82%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 120GB-$15
80GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR013
SusWrite @10s intervals: 252 52 60 57 57 52 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
46.7% Average
Read 408
Write 366
Mixed 349
SusWrite 88.4
68% 303 MB/s
4K Read 23.4
4K Write 68.6
4K Mixed 1
73% 31 MB/s
DQ Read 187
DQ Write 58.1
DQ Mixed 44.2
53% 96.4 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 46.7%
Great: 86%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905594-001.A00LF Adata AM1U16BC2P1-B1AH 4GB
1600, 1600 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
41.8% Average
MC Read 15.2
MC Write 15.7
MC Mixed 14.5
43% 15.1 GB/s
SC Read 6.3
SC Write 9.6
SC Mixed 10.2
25% 8.7 GB/s
Latency 83.9
48% 83.9 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 41.8%
Great: 42%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ProBook 6470b Builds (Compare 551 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP ProBook 6470b

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 49% - Average Total price: $227
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback