Today's hottest deals

Asus NX90Jq

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (83rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 17 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics2.98% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive10.7% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus NX90Jq  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK NX90Jq
Memory4.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100708
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 27 '18 at 20:07
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User CHE-User
Background CPU 21%

 PC Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 Q 720-$220
Socket 989, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 1.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
58.6% Above average
Memory 92.5
1-Core 43.4
2-Core 72.8
49% 69.6 Pts
4-Core 137
8-Core 217
22% 177 Pts
64-Core 221
14% 221 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 58.6%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 335M
Asus(1043 1342) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.1
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
2.98% Terrible
Lighting 3.7
Reflection 5.62
Parallax 1.59
3% 3.64 fps
MRender 5.38
Gravity 2.67
Splatting 3
3% 3.68 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.98%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingrich K9 60GB SATA3 SSD
12GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 12345678
SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 6.5 6.4 1.5 4.1 12 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
10.7% Very poor
Read 107
Write 13.5
Mixed 3.8
SusWrite 6.8
7% 32.9 MB/s
4K Read 15.1
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
23% 5.03 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 10.7%
Great: 46%
Seagate ST9640320AS 640GB-$270
181GB free
Firmware: 0002SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 72 80 82 83 84 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
46.6% Average
Read 81.8
Write 75.7
Mixed 44
SusWrite 80.6
52% 70.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.7
117% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 46.6%
Great: 49%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown M471B5273CH0-CH9 80AD HMT325S6BFR8C-H9 80AD HMT325S6BFR8C-H9 8GB
1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 2048, 2048 MB
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
39.5% Below average
MC Read 15.7
MC Write 11.5
MC Mixed 13.2
38% 13.5 GB/s
SC Read 9.1
SC Write 8
SC Mixed 10.7
26% 9.27 GB/s
Latency 63.2
63% 63.2 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 39.5%
Great: 39%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical NX90Jq Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Asus NX90Jq

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 48% - Average Total price: $330
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $238Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback