HP h8-1234

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics13.9% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory10GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 10GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP h8-1234  (all builds)
MotherboardGigabyte 2AC8
Memory1.4 GB free of 10 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120417
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateOct 23 '18 at 19:05
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 27%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-6120 Six-Core
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 1.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
45.1% Average
Memory 71.2
1-Core 31.9
2-Core 61.3
38% 54.8 Pts
4-Core 107
8-Core 143
16% 125 Pts
64-Core 134
8% 134 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 45.1%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 7770
XFX(1682 3231) 1GB
CLim: 1095 MHz, MLim: 1245 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 18.10.1
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
13.9% Very poor
Lighting 16.9
Reflection 18
Parallax 22.8
14% 19.2 fps
MRender 15.3
Gravity 15.3
Splatting 20.2
14% 16.9 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 13.9%
Great: 14%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$25
842GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HP13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 131 100 142 149 148 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
94.1% Outstanding
Read 195
Write 182
Mixed 81.7
SusWrite 133
108% 148 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
154% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 94.1%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT325U6CFR8C-PB Micron 16JTF51264AZ-1G6M1 Micron 16JTF51264AZ-1G6M1 10GB
1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
2048, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
26.1% Poor
MC Read 9.4
MC Write 8.9
MC Mixed 8.4
25% 8.9 GB/s
SC Read 6.7
SC Write 5.2
SC Mixed 6.9
18% 6.27 GB/s
Latency 98.6
41% 98.6 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 26.1%
Great: 68%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical h8-1234 Builds (Compare 22 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: HP h8-1234

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 4% - Terrible Total price: $102
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback