Asus F3Sr

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 36%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.51% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive33.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAsus F3Sr  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK F3Sr
Memory1.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1280 x 800 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20080401
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 29 '18 at 09:43
Run Duration160 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Duo T7250-$97
Socket 478, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
36% Below average
Memory 65.4
1-Core 22.9
2-Core 43.5
32% 43.9 Pts
4-Core 42.4
8-Core 40.8
6% 41.6 Pts
64-Core 33.2
2% 33.2 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 36%
Great: 39%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 2400
Asus(1043 15B2) 128MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
0.51% Terrible
Lighting 0.57
Reflection 1.38
Parallax 0.22
0% 0.72 fps
MRender 0.86
Gravity 0.13
Splatting 1.13
1% 0.71 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.51%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD Plus 240GB-$31
11GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z22000RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 160 90 133 184 5.3 MB/s
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
33.2% Below average
Read 220
Write 185
Mixed 168
SusWrite 118
39% 173 MB/s
4K Read 15
4K Write 12.5
4K Mixed 9.4
41% 12.3 MB/s
DQ Read 131
DQ Write 85.1
DQ Mixed 72.2
64% 96 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 33.2%
Great: 86%
Generic SP32G SD Card 32GB
1GB free
Firmware: 8.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.8 6.8 6.2 6.8 7.2 7.4 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
3.76% Terrible
Read 4.5
Write 5.7
Mixed 5.3
SusWrite 6.8
4% 5.57 MB/s
4K Read 3.1
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 3.1
520% 2.9 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 3.76%
Great: 23%
ST1000LM 024 HN-M101M 1TB
44GB free, PID 0408
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 20 18 21 23 25 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
13.3% Very poor
Read 27.5
Write 16.4
Mixed 17.3
SusWrite 21.1
27% 20.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
80% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 13.3%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR2
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
12.2% Very poor
MC Read 4.5
MC Write 3.1
MC Mixed 3.2
10% 3.6 GB/s
SC Read 3.2
SC Write 2.5
SC Mixed 3.4
9% 3.03 GB/s
Latency 113
36% 113 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 12.2%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical F3Sr Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Asus F3Sr

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 47% - Average Total price: $90
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback