Performance Results


Gaming 14% Tree trunk	Desktop 75% Battleship	Workstation 12% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	10.8% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	87.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2860QM-$469 4,317 User benchmarks, average bench 62% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	76.4% Very good	Memory 95.2 1-Core 92.1 2-Core 178 73% 122 Pts	4-Core 318 8-Core 417 47% 368 Pts	64-Core 334 21% 334 Pts
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 76.4% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon R9 M200X 678 User benchmarks, average bench 10% Dell(1028 04A3) 2GB Ram: 2GB, Driver: 17.7 Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	10.8% Very poor	Lighting 13.3 Reflection 13 Parallax 16.8 11% 14.4 fps	MRender 10.7 Gravity 11.8 Splatting 15.2 11% 12.6 fps
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 10.8% Great: 12%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52 296,814 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 67GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 358 345 319 312 307 308 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	87.1% Excellent	Read 468 Write 445 Mixed 428 SusWrite 325 94% 417 MB/s	4K Read 25.2 4K Write 45 4K Mixed 31.8 103% 34 MB/s	DQ Read 390 DQ Write 349 DQ Mixed 364 274% 368 MB/s
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 87.1% Great: 128%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CMSX8GX3M2B1866C10 029E CMSX8GX3M2A1600C9 8GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	54.3% Above average	MC Read 19.9 MC Write 18.4 MC Mixed 16.7 52% 18.3 GB/s	SC Read 16.1 SC Write 16.2 SC Mixed 16.1 46% 16.1 GB/s	Latency 56.4 71% 56.4 ns
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 54.3% Great: 55%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 54%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

GPU
Quadro 1000MNvidiaBench 3%, 6,108 samples	227x
Quadro 2000MNvidiaBench 5%, 3,227 samples	171x
HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 110,588 samples	85x

RAM
M471B5273DH0-CH9 2x4GBSamsungBench 43%, 15,815 samples	26x
HMT351S6CFR8C-H9 2x4GBHynixBench 43%, 6,386 samples	16x
M471B5273DH0-CH9 4x4GBSamsungBench 45%, 885 samples	12x

Value: 65% - Good

Total price: $113

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16