HP Compaq Pro 6305 SFF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics4.79% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Compaq Pro 6305 SFF  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 1850
Memory13.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1600 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20130222
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 08 '18 at 13:05
Run Duration153 Seconds
Run User PAK-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A6-5400B APU
P0, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
45.1% Average
Memory 75.7
1-Core 43.6
2-Core 70.4
43% 63.2 Pts
4-Core 89.3
8-Core 78.9
12% 84.1 Pts
64-Core 87.4
5% 87.4 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 45.1%
Great: 51%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7540D + R7 200 Dual Graphics
XFX(1682 7240) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 22.19.162.4
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
4.79% Terrible
Lighting 6.83
Reflection 8.96
Parallax 8.81
6% 8.2 fps
MRender 7.05
Gravity 6.6
Splatting 0.09
3% 4.58 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 4.79%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$25
344GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 19.01H19
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 97 109 107 106 104 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
60.2% Good
Read 106
Write 109
Mixed 56
SusWrite 103
69% 93.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.9
159% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 60.2%
Great: 69%
Seagate Expansion 1TB
268GB free
Firmware: 9300
SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 9.7 9.4 9.6 9.7 11 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
11.2% Very poor
Read 29
Write 10
Mixed 10.5
SusWrite 9.8
11% 14.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.1
38% 0.27 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 11.2%
Great: 66%
Seagate Expansion 500GB
280GB free
Firmware: 0636
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 24 26 26 26 25 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
15% Very poor
Read 26.3
Write 33.3
Mixed 27.8
SusWrite 25.7
21% 28.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.5
87% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 15%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
H K K S M 16GB
667, 800, 667, 667 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
28.8% Poor
MC Read 12.9
MC Write 5.7
MC Mixed 9.9
27% 9.5 GB/s
SC Read 8
SC Write 7.5
SC Mixed 9.9
24% 8.47 GB/s
Latency 88.9
45% 88.9 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Compaq Pro 6305 SFF Builds (Compare 484 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq Pro 6305 SFF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback