MSI X99A RAIDER (MS-7885)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (84th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 16 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics49.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMSI MS-7885
MotherboardMSI X99A RAIDER (MS-7885)  (all builds)
Memory19.6 GB free of 24 GB @ 3 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160719
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 28 '18 at 13:48
Run Duration217 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (84th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6800K-$103
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
89.4% Excellent
Memory 95.1
1-Core 127
2-Core 253
89% 158 Pts
4-Core 451
8-Core 719
72% 585 Pts
64-Core 961
60% 961 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 89.4%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
Nvidia(10DE 1131) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 398.36
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
49.7% Average
Lighting 61.6
Reflection 65.1
Parallax 58.3
50% 61.7 fps
MRender 70
Gravity 57.3
Splatting 54.5
49% 60.6 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 49.7%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
34GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 3,929
Write 76.8
Mixed 147
288% 1,384 MB/s
4K Read 662
4K Write 4.6
4K Mixed 9.1
1,017% 225 MB/s
Poor: 153% Great: 254%
Crucial BX200 480GB-$160
447GB free
Firmware: MU01.6
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 491
Write 443
Mixed 393
98% 442 MB/s
4K Read 31.7
4K Write 101
4K Mixed 47.2
162% 59.9 MB/s
DQ Read 296
DQ Write 318
DQ Mixed 236
197% 283 MB/s
Poor: 57% Great: 95%
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 1TB
0GB free
Firmware: 2BA30001
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 40
Write 29
Mixed 32.5
26% 33.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
113% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 14% Great: 59%
WD WD6400AADS-00M2B0 640GB
17GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 3,859
Write 41
Mixed 71.7
948% 1,324 MB/s
4K Read 702
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 1.8
29,473% 235 MB/s
Poor: 19% Great: 59%
Seagate ST33000651AS 3TB-$78
2TB free
Firmware: CC43
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 4,129
Write 57.7
Mixed 84.2
1,020% 1,424 MB/s
4K Read 713
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 4.1
30,185% 240 MB/s
Poor: 46% Great: 86%
Seagate ST2000LM003 HN-M201RAD 2TB
887GB free
Firmware: 2BC10009
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 4039
Write 46
Mixed 121
1,006% 1,402 MB/s
4K Read 717
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 2
30,138% 240 MB/s
Poor: 23% Great: 70%
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB (2009)-$50
102GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 3,970
Write 53.2
Mixed 92.7
984% 1,372 MB/s
4K Read 693
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 2
29,109% 232 MB/s
Poor: 15% Great: 43%
JMicron Generic 120GB
60GB free, PID 0576
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 3,950
Write 59
Mixed 116
960% 1,375 MB/s
4K Read 668
4K Write 3.6
4K Mixed 7.2
2,846% 226 MB/s
Poor: 114% Great: 262%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3200 C16 Series 3000 C16 Series 3200 C16 Series 3200 C16 Series 3000 C16 Series 3200 C16 Series 24GB
3000, 3000, 3000, 3000, 3000, 3000 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
114% Outstanding
MC Read 41.3
MC Write 51.5
MC Mixed 40.1
127% 44.3 GB/s
SC Read 15.4
SC Write 21.4
SC Mixed 22.1
56% 19.6 GB/s
Latency 56.7
71% 56.7 ns
Poor: 89%
This bench: 114%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99A RAIDER (MS-7885) Builds (Compare 884 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 64%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 57%
Gunboat

Motherboard: MSI X99A RAIDER (MS-7885)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $352
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback