ADD TO PC
BUILD

Ptltd_ 661MX

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 22.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	The RAM on this system should be upgraded to at least 2GB although on 32bit systems 1GB will suffice as a bare minimum.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

System	Ptltd_ 661MX (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory	0.2 GB free of 1 GB @ 0 GHz
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20060622
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Apr 22 '16 at 10:13
Run Duration	1686 Seconds
Run User	ZAF-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium M processor 2.00GHz 110 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Socket 479M, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads Base clock 2 GHz Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	22.9% Poor	Memory 42.9 1-Core 19 2-Core 19.3 21% 27.1 Pts	4-Core 19.4 8-Core 19.5 3% 19.5 Pts	64-Core 19.4 1% 19.4 Pts
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 22.9% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Fujitsu MHV2080AH 80GB 42 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 38GB free (System drive) Firmware: 00830096 Max speed: UDMA 100 100 MB/s Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 33302 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 20316516 (03) Spinup time 100 100 1 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 3090 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 8585639690241 (07) Seek error rate 100 91 465 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 76 76 43421722 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 2329 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 192 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 96 96 85606 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 244813987893 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 11 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 460259329 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 1 (C8) Write error rate 100 100 20488 (CB) Run out cancel 100 100 3728336885369	16.9% Very poor	Read 28.1 Write 30.5 Mixed 27.4 22% 28.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.34 4K Write 0.99 4K Mixed 0.23 58% 0.52 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 16.9% Great: 18%
Seagate FreeAgent Go 250GB 94 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 85GB free, PID 2120 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	12.4% Very poor	Read 22.5 Write 21 Mixed 21.5 28% 21.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.46 4K Write 1.45 4K Mixed 0.3 61% 0.74 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 12.4% Great: 18%
USBDev Pendrive 8GB 165 User benchmarks, average bench 4% 7GB free, PID 1400 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	3.45% Terrible	Read 16.7 Write 3.17 Mixed 4.07 8% 7.98 MB/s	4K Read 1.37 4K Write 0.006 4K Mixed 0.001 5% 0.46 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.45% Great: 6%
Maxtor OneTouch 160GB 102 User benchmarks, average bench 13% 0GB free, PID 7350 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	9.11% Terrible	Read 18.4 Write 21.2 Mixed 19.3 26% 19.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.28 4K Write 0.57 4K Mixed 0.17 26% 0.34 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 9.11% Great: 17%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x0.5GB 3,675 User benchmarks, average bench 10% 2 of 3 slots used 1GB DIMM DDR Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	6.39% Terrible	MC Read 2.1 MC Write 2.1 MC Mixed 1.5 5% 1.9 GB/s	SC Read 1.2 SC Write 2.1 SC Mixed 0 3% 1.1 GB/s	Latency 189 21% 189 ns
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 6.39% Great: 15%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback