Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 38% Jet ski	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	2.34% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	32.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron J4105 1,216 User benchmarks, average bench 36% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	40.4% Average	Memory 48.3 1-Core 52.3 2-Core 104 40% 68.3 Pts	4-Core 185 8-Core 204 26% 195 Pts	64-Core 201 12% 201 Pts
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 40.4% Great: 42%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 600 35,976 User benchmarks, average bench 1% ASRock(1849 2212) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 23.20.16.4973 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	2.34% Terrible	Lighting 2.37 Reflection 3.46 Parallax 2.34 2% 2.72 fps	MRender 3.81 Gravity 2.4 Splatting 4.87 3% 3.69 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 2.34% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Tcsunbow X3 120GB 1,572 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 22GB free (System drive) Firmware: R0327B0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 170 210 24 44 48 47 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	32.7% Below average	Read 424 Write 341 Mixed 50.8 SusWrite 90.3 50% 226 MB/s	4K Read 14.7 4K Write 10.8 4K Mixed 2.4 31% 9.3 MB/s	DQ Read 57.6 DQ Write 17.7 DQ Mixed 1 10% 25.4 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 32.7% Great: 112%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron_ 8ATF1G64HZ-2G6E1 1x8GB 21 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	25.6% Poor	MC Read 9.1 MC Write 9.7 MC Mixed 10.3 28% 9.7 GB/s	SC Read 3.3 SC Write 4.6 SC Mixed 4.2 12% 4.03 GB/s	Latency 167 24% 167 ns
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 25.6% Great: 26%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 37%

Jet ski

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

CPU
Celeron J4105IntelBench 36%, 1,216 samples	11x

GPU
UHD Graphics 600IntelBench 1%, 35,976 samples	5x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	2x
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	1x

SSD
750 EVO 250GBSamsung $55Bench 94%, 75,831 samples	1x
Sata III 120GBIntensoBench 68%, 2,648 samples	1x
128GB 128GBIntensoBench 66%, 1,805 samples	1x

RAM
CT4G4SFS824A.M8FG 2x4GBCrucialBench 69%, 62 samples	2x
F4 DDR4 2400 C16 2x4GBG.SKILLBench 72%, 322 samples	1x
F4 DDR4 2400 C16 1x8GBG.SKILLBench 39%, 1,390 samples	1x

Value: 19% - Very poor

Total price: $55

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16