Lenovo 90JB005GUS

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 33% Sail boat	Desktop 88% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 29% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (85th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 15 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	31.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (38%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	Lenovo 90JB005GUS (all builds)
Motherboard	LENOVO 36EF
Memory	12 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170927
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Aug 01 '18 at 00:47
Run Duration	140 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	38%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9400F How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-8400-$126 312,220 User benchmarks, average bench 82% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	91.2% Outstanding	Memory 91.5 1-Core 122 2-Core 245 86% 153 Pts	4-Core 490 8-Core 724 76% 607 Pts	64-Core 692 43% 692 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 91.2% Great: 89%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% MSI(1462 3510) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 388.16 Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	31.8% Below average	Lighting 39.9 Reflection 31.5 Parallax 37.4 32% 36.2 fps	MRender 37.7 Gravity 37.6 Splatting 36.2 30% 37.2 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 31.8% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLW128HEGR-000L1 128GB 2,374 User benchmarks, average bench 169% 26GB free (System drive) Firmware: 5L1QCXB7 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 1,216 Write 755 Mixed 512 182% 827 MB/s	4K Read 56.2 4K Write 137 4K Mixed 68.8 246% 87.4 MB/s	DQ Read 885 DQ Write 743 DQ Mixed 697 554% 775 MB/s
Poor: 93% Great: 213%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$32 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 931GB free Firmware: 02.01A02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 180 188 191 190 190 191 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	112% Outstanding	Read 203 Write 167 Mixed 95.4 SusWrite 188 120% 163 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 1.2 240% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 112% Great: 109%
SanDisk Cruzer 32GB 3,296 User benchmarks, average bench 11% 29GB free, PID 5530 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.4 3.5 3.3 3.6 3.6 3.6 MB/s Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	9.76% Terrible	Read 18.1 Write 11.5 Mixed 10.8 SusWrite 3.8 14% 11.1 MB/s	4K Read 3.3 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 2.2 148% 2.43 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 9.76% Great: 18%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Ramaxel RMUA5110ME78HAF-2666 2x8GB 1,816 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	87.6% Excellent	MC Read 34.7 MC Write 34.1 MC Mixed 24.8 89% 31.2 GB/s	SC Read 18.8 SC Write 33.8 SC Mixed 27 76% 26.5 GB/s	Latency 65 62% 65 ns
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 87.6% Great: 90%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 90JB005GUS Builds (Compare 10 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 32%

Sail boat

Desktop 90%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 28%

Raft

System: Lenovo 90JB005GUS

CPU
Core i5-8400Intel $126Bench 82%, 312,220 samples	10x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	5x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $240Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	3x
GTX 1660-TiNvidia $143Bench 76%, 318,562 samples	1x

SSD
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $106Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	2x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	2x
MZVLW128HEGR-000L1 128GBSamsungBench 169%, 2,374 samples	1x

RAM
RMUA5110ME78HAF-2666 2x8GBRamaxelBench 81%, 1,816 samples	8x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair $103Bench 88%, 110,884 samples	1x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 1x16GBCorsairBench 47%, 2,407 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 118% - Outstanding

Total price: $291

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $289	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $168	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16