Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 49% Yacht	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (5th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 95 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	19.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (68%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-7400-$70 234,266 User benchmarks, average bench 64% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	42.8% Average	Memory 42 1-Core 63.7 2-Core 127 43% 77.6 Pts	4-Core 245 8-Core 284 34% 264 Pts	64-Core 298 18% 298 Pts
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 42.8% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Nvidia(10DE 1C82) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 1992 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 516.94 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	19.5% Very poor	Lighting 29.3 Reflection 16.9 Parallax 13.3 24% 19.8 fps	MRender 14.5 Gravity 18.4 Splatting 9.5 11% 14.1 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 19.5% Great: 33%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 43GB free (System drive) Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 47 41 50 41 85 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	52.4% Above average	Read 132 Write 116 Mixed 52.6 SusWrite 50.3 64% 87.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.9 159% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 52.4% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BLS8G4D240FSBK.8FBD 1x8GB 2,476 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	26.5% Poor	MC Read 12 MC Write 10.4 MC Mixed 7.8 29% 10.1 GB/s	SC Read 3.8 SC Write 5.9 SC Mixed 4.8 14% 4.83 GB/s	Latency 193 21% 193 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 26.5% Great: 47%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 43%

Speed boat

Desktop 78%

Battleship

Workstation 34%

Sail boat

RAM
TEAMGROUP-UD4-2400 2x8GBUnknownBench 75%, 25,824 samples	36x
HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GBKingstonBench 76%, 122,822 samples	36x
Ripjaws V DDR4 2400 C15 2x8GBG.SKILL $31Bench 71%, 98,777 samples	34x

Value: 75% - Very good

Total price: $388