Toshiba Satellite C650

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, RAM
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Graphics	0.3% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	46.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Toshiba Satellite C650 (all builds)
Motherboard	TOSHIBA Portable PC
Memory	0.6 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit renk
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20100427
Uptime	2 Days
Run Date	Apr 15 '16 at 20:27
Run Duration	184 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	17%

PC Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium T4500 8,800 User benchmarks, average bench 34% CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.15 GHz (avg) Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		1-Core 28.4 2-Core 37.7 16% 33 Pts	4-Core 36.6 8-Core 58.2 6% 47.4 Pts	64-Core 56.4 4% 56.4 Pts
Poor: 19% Great: 41%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel Mobile Series 4 Express Chipset Family 23,924 User benchmarks, average bench 0% Toshiba(1179 FDE0) Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2702 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	0.3% Terrible	Lighting 0.4 Reflection 0.35 Parallax 0.41 0% 0.38 fps	MRender 0.43 Gravity 0.2 Splatting 0.3 0% 0.31 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.3% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
ESA3SME2HTMTT120GB 120GB 281 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 31GB free (System drive) Firmware: O1015A Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 6 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 15 (A0) Unknown 100 100 0 (A1) Unknown 100 100 99 (A3) Unknown 100 100 53 (A4) Unknown 100 100 1813 (A5) Unknown 100 100 3 (A6) Unknown 100 100 0 (A7) Unknown 100 100 0 (A8) Unknown 100 100 1000 (A9) Unknown 100 100 100 (AF) Unknown 100 100 0 (B0) Unknown 100 100 0 (B1) Unknown 100 100 0 (B2) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 30 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (E8) Unknown 100 100 100 (F1) Unknown 100 100 4111 (F2) Unknown 100 100 4135 (F5) Unknown 100 100 3626	46.4% Average	Read 256 Write 234 Mixed 250 55% 247 MB/s	4K Read 15.9 4K Write 30.2 4K Mixed 18.2 64% 21.4 MB/s	DQ Read 54.8 DQ Write 44.3 DQ Mixed 17.1 22% 38.8 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 46.4% Great: 92%
Mass Storage Device 500GB 5,742 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 466GB free, PID 6116 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	9.26% Terrible	Read 30.4 Write 21.2 Mixed 24.6 31% 25.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.04 4K Write 0.07 4K Mixed 0.04 4% 0.05 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 9.26% Great: 22%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1x2GB 99,586 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 1 of 2 slots used 2GB SODIMM DDR3 Relative performance n/a - RAM benchmark error
Poor: 7% Great: 26%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Satellite C650 Builds (Compare 79 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 34%

Sail boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: Toshiba Satellite C650

CPU
Pentium T4500IntelBench 34%, 8,800 samples	14x
Core i3 M 330IntelBench 38%, 14,119 samples	10x
Core i3 M 350Intel $199Bench 38%, 14,351 samples	8x

GPU
HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 99,513 samples	41x
Mobile Series 4 Express Chipset FamilyIntelBench 0%, 23,924 samples	18x
HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples	9x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	3x
MX500 1TBCrucial $74Bench 106%, 202,785 samples	2x
A400 120GBKingston $30Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	2x

RAM
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	7x
M471B5773DH0-CH9 1x2GBSamsungBench 23%, 2,805 samples	6x
1x2GBUnknownBench 17%, 99,586 samples	6x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 21% - Poor

Total price: $28

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16