Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 13% Tree trunk	Desktop 61% Destroyer	Workstation 10% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	25.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	HP Compaq Pro 4300 SFF PC (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 2ADE
Memory	6.6 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130123
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jul 28 '18 at 19:45
Run Duration	145 Seconds
Run User	MEX-User
Background CPU	18%

PC Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-3220-$79 71,790 User benchmarks, average bench 52% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (40^th percentile)	50.9% Above average	Memory 81.8 1-Core 73.3 2-Core 116 57% 90.4 Pts	4-Core 116 8-Core 133 16% 125 Pts	64-Core 162 10% 162 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 50.9% Great: 62%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101 269,381 User benchmarks, average bench 26% Gigabyte(1458 372E) CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 398.36 Performing below potential (73^rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	25.9% Poor	Lighting 31.7 Reflection 23.3 Parallax 29.5 26% 28.2 fps	MRender 35.3 Gravity 30.6 Splatting 29.8 26% 31.9 fps
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 25.9% Great: 28%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Hitachi HDS721050CLA660 500GB 17,638 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 256GB free (System drive) Firmware: JP2OA41A SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 32 40 58 61 66 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	27.8% Poor	Read 46.7 Write 59.3 Mixed 36.7 SusWrite 49.9 36% 48.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.6 102% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 27.8% Great: 76%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 16GB 15,750 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 14GB free, PID 6545 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.1 3.3 2.7 2.1 3.6 3.3 MB/s Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)	4.16% Terrible	Read 16.2 Write 4.3 Mixed 6.7 SusWrite 2.8 8% 7.5 MB/s	4K Read 3.8 4K Write 0.1 4K Mixed 0.1 21% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.16% Great: 6%
ADATA CH11 500GB 514 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 119GB free, PID a11a Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 25 26 27 28 27 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	11.2% Very poor	Read 28.3 Write 25 Mixed 14.8 SusWrite 26.6 31% 23.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.4 29% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 11.2% Great: 40%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston KHX1866C10D3/8G Hynix HMT351U6CFR8C-PB 12GB 39 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 4096 MB Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	40% Average	MC Read 14.1 MC Write 14 MC Mixed 13.4 40% 13.8 GB/s	SC Read 8.2 SC Write 10.2 SC Mixed 13 30% 10.5 GB/s	Latency 77.2 52% 77.2 ns
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 40% Great: 56%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 51%

Yacht

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	152x
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	44x
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	26x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	18x
CS900 120GBPNY $25Bench 69%, 42,924 samples	9x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $38Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	6x

RAM
HMT351U6CFR8C-PB 1x4GBHynixBench 29%, 7,230 samples	10x
8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 1x4GBMicronBench 28%, 7,085 samples	7x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	7x

Value: 60% - Good

Total price: $107

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16