User System

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics12.8% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive35.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemGBT___ NVDAACPI
MotherboardGigabyte M57SLI-S4
Memory5.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20090525
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJul 19 '18 at 12:02
Run Duration191 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom 9550
Socket M2, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
46.2% Average
Memory 71.2
1-Core 29.6
2-Core 60.1
37% 53.6 Pts
4-Core 126
8-Core 127
17% 126 Pts
64-Core 127
8% 127 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 46.2%
Great: 50%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 7770
Gigabyte(1458 2556) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.982.0.0
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
12.8% Very poor
Lighting 15.8
Reflection 17.3
Parallax 22.6
13% 18.6 fps
MRender 14.4
Gravity 16.2
Splatting 16
13% 15.5 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 12.8%
Great: 14%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$38
65GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 521A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 79 80 83 85 84 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
35.6% Below average
Read 93.3
Write 101
Mixed 113
SusWrite 81.7
22% 97.3 MB/s
4K Read 18.5
4K Write 37.4
4K Mixed 22
76% 26 MB/s
DQ Read 70.3
DQ Write 74.1
DQ Mixed 43
40% 62.5 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 35.6%
Great: 73%
Intel 320 Series 80GB-$60
3GB free
Firmware: 4PC1
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 158
Write 84.5
Mixed 108
26% 117 MB/s
4K Read 16.2
4K Write 28.3
4K Mixed 16.3
60% 20.3 MB/s
DQ Read 69.2
DQ Write 50.4
DQ Mixed 46
38% 55.2 MB/s
Poor: 26% Great: 45%
Seagate ST3250620A 250GB-$80
8GB free
Firmware: 3.AAE
SusWrite @10s intervals: 46 46 46 46 46 46 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
25% Poor
Read 40.8
Write 43.5
Mixed 31.5
SusWrite 46
30% 40.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.8
138% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 25%
Great: 42%
Samsung Spinpoint T166 500GB-$40
24GB free
Firmware: CR10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 39 39 39 39 39 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
25.7% Poor
Read 50.5
Write 63
Mixed 39.5
SusWrite 38.9
36% 48 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
140% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 25.7%
Great: 44%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$28
266GB free
Firmware: MS2O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 56 53 55 56 54 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
55.5% Above average
Read 139
Write 53.3
Mixed 35.8
SusWrite 54.4
52% 70.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.5
111% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 55.5%
Great: 107%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 4GB
2GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.1 5.8 5.5 5.9 5.9 5.5 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
8.35% Terrible
Read 21.3
Write 4.8
Mixed 8.5
SusWrite 5.6
11% 10 MB/s
4K Read 4.1
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 1.6
104% 2.23 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 8.35%
Great: 12%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
24.3% Poor
MC Read 9.7
MC Write 5.6
MC Mixed 9.6
24% 8.3 GB/s
SC Read 5.3
SC Write 4.8
SC Mixed 6.2
16% 5.43 GB/s
Latency 98.7
40% 98.7 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 24.3%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback