Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 59% Gunboat	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	1.87% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	53.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2670QM-$200 51,169 User benchmarks, average bench 56% CPU1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	66% Good	Memory 84 1-Core 78.1 2-Core 152 63% 105 Pts	4-Core 261 8-Core 372 40% 317 Pts	64-Core 371 23% 371 Pts
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 66% Great: 67%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz) 209,058 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Acer(1025 050E) 2GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459 Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	1.87% Terrible	Lighting 2.03 Reflection 3.12 Parallax 1.38 2% 2.17 fps	MRender 3 Gravity 1.13 Splatting 3.87 2% 2.67 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.87% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Adata Premier Pro SP900 128GB-$40 2,820 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 23GB free (System drive) Firmware: 5.6.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 111 129 122 121 124 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	53.4% Above average	Read 356 Write 142 Mixed 200 SusWrite 120 45% 204 MB/s	4K Read 19.8 4K Write 45.9 4K Mixed 22.4 83% 29.4 MB/s	DQ Read 137 DQ Write 146 DQ Mixed 133 102% 139 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 53.4% Great: 80%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Nanya NT4GC64B8HB0NS-CG 2x4GB 3,068 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	47.8% Average	MC Read 17 MC Write 16.9 MC Mixed 15.2 47% 16.4 GB/s	SC Read 14.3 SC Write 14.3 SC Mixed 14.3 41% 14.3 GB/s	Latency 73.5 54% 73.5 ns
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 47.8% Great: 51%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 52%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

GPU
Radeon HD 6630MAMDBench 5%, 2,501 samples	47x
HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples	47x
HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 110,588 samples	47x

RAM
NT4GC64B8HB0NS-CG 2x4GBNanyaBench 42%, 3,068 samples	18x
NT4GC64B8HB0NS-CG Kingston ACR256X64D3S13C9G 6GBNanyaBench 39%, 97 samples	7x
EBJ41UF8BCS0-DJ-F 2x4GBElpidaBench 45%, 3,512 samples	6x

Value: 46% - Average

Total price: $301

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16