Asus PRIME Z270-P

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 74%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 63%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics72.8% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive141% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus PRIME Z270-P  (all builds)
Memory5.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit färger
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180511
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJul 15 '18 at 13:42
Run Duration188 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$180
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
96.6% Outstanding
Memory 95.2
1-Core 140
2-Core 251
92% 162 Pts
4-Core 528
8-Core 763
81% 645 Pts
64-Core 768
48% 768 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 96.6%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX Titan X-$615
Nvidia(10DE 1132) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1642 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 398.36
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
72.8% Very good
Lighting 103
Reflection 133
Parallax 120
84% 119 fps
MRender 104
Gravity 111
Splatting 0.13
51% 71.8 fps
Poor: 68%
This bench: 72.8%
Great: 83%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB (2017)-$135
185GB free (System drive)
Firmware: B35900WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 229 212 207 192 191 210 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
141% Outstanding
Read 1036
Write 388
Mixed 425
SusWrite 207
113% 514 MB/s
4K Read 43.2
4K Write 117
4K Mixed 54.7
197% 71.6 MB/s
DQ Read 661
DQ Write 521
DQ Mixed 282
295% 488 MB/s
Poor: 86%
This bench: 141%
Great: 144%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
325GB free
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 477 465 476 478 482 482 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
130% Outstanding
Read 494
Write 488
Mixed 406
SusWrite 476
105% 466 MB/s
4K Read 45.2
4K Write 117
4K Mixed 62.2
210% 74.8 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 345
DQ Mixed 360
271% 362 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 130%
Great: 134%
OCZ Trion 100 240GB-$95
223GB free
Firmware: SAFM11.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 206 117 111 112 120 113 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
90.6% Outstanding
Read 516
Write 488
Mixed 387
SusWrite 130
85% 380 MB/s
4K Read 31.3
4K Write 100
4K Mixed 40.8
153% 57.5 MB/s
DQ Read 348
DQ Write 330
DQ Mixed 188
183% 289 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 90.6%
Great: 83%
Samsung HD502IJ 500GB-$40
466GB free
Firmware: 1AA01113
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 113 112 111 112 113 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
64.7% Good
Read 113
Write 77.7
Mixed 64.5
SusWrite 112
68% 91.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
187% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 64.7%
Great: 59%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$64
245GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 99 98 99 99 99 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
69.1% Good
Read 142
Write 133
Mixed 76.7
SusWrite 98.8
83% 113 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1
205% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 69.1%
Great: 85%
SanDisk U3 Cruzer Micro 16GB
4GB free, PID 5406
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 13 13 14 11 14 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
8.97% Terrible
Read 26.5
Write 9.5
Mixed 4.2
SusWrite 13
15% 13.3 MB/s
4K Read 9.7
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
36% 3.23 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 8.97%
Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 2400 C15 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
80.5% Excellent
MC Read 30.5
MC Write 31.1
MC Mixed 22.8
80% 28.1 GB/s
SC Read 16.4
SC Write 32.8
SC Mixed 25.4
71% 24.9 GB/s
Latency 56.5
71% 56.5 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 80.5%
Great: 91%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME Z270-P Builds (Compare 6,390 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 71%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Asus PRIME Z270-P - $140

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $645
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $274Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback