Asrock Z370M Pro4

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 104% UFO	Desktop 91% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 97% Nuclear submarine


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	110% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock Z370M Pro4 (all builds)
Memory	13 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	Цвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180314
Uptime	2.1 Days
Run Date	Jul 13 '18 at 07:20
Run Duration	143 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	3%

Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8700-$200 349,567 User benchmarks, average bench 87% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	97% Outstanding	Memory 92.9 1-Core 139 2-Core 274 94% 169 Pts	4-Core 543 8-Core 913 89% 728 Pts	64-Core 1,126 70% 1,126 Pts
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 97% Great: 94%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195 1,082,454 User benchmarks, average bench 102% Nvidia(10DE 1B80) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 398.36 Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	110% Outstanding	Lighting 148 Reflection 153 Parallax 129 121% 143 fps	MRender 115 Gravity 140 Splatting 109 98% 121 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 110% Great: 110%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45 240,629 User benchmarks, average bench 199% 49GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 1,716 Write 1,395 Mixed 503 265% 1,205 MB/s	4K Read 43.1 4K Write 142 4K Mixed 53.3 209% 79.4 MB/s	DQ Read 1,098 DQ Write 1,070 DQ Mixed 778 668% 982 MB/s
Poor: 142% Great: 236%
WD WD1002FBYS-02A6B0 1TB 28,278 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 453GB free Firmware: 03.00C06 SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 68 69 70 69 70 MB/s Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	48.2% Average	Read 98.5 Write 87.3 Mixed 73 SusWrite 68.8 61% 81.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 1.1 200% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 48.2% Great: 62%
Adata DashDrive Elite S102 Pro USB 3.0 64GB-$13 599 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 58GB free, PID 312b Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 58 58 59 58 59 MB/s Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	32.9% Below average	Read 120 Write 88.7 Mixed 25 SusWrite 58.2 89% 72.9 MB/s	4K Read 8.1 4K Write 0.3 4K Mixed 0 40% 2.8 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 32.9% Great: 51%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
HyperX Predator 2666 C13 2x8GB-$137 7,627 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (28^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	76.4% Very good	MC Read 29.9 MC Write 28.9 MC Mixed 21.1 76% 26.6 GB/s	SC Read 18.5 SC Write 29.2 SC Mixed 25.1 69% 24.3 GB/s	Latency 62.3 64% 62.3 ns
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 76.4% Great: 99%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Z370M Pro4 Builds (Compare 1,418 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 55%

Yacht

Desktop 91%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 50%

Yacht

Motherboard: Asrock Z370M Pro4

CPU
Core i7-8700KIntel $193Bench 88%, 746,287 samples	269x
Core i5-8400Intel $131Bench 82%, 312,220 samples	224x
Core i5-8600KIntel $173Bench 91%, 264,837 samples	187x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	92x
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	84x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	81x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	38x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	30x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	24x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $48Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	34x
Aegis DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 82%, 163,634 samples	34x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $34Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	32x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 88% - Excellent

Total price: $457

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16