| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
| Graphics | 13.3% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks. |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 8GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| System | HP Z400 Workstation (all builds) |
| Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 0B4Ch |
| Memory | 5.8 GB free of 8.00195 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20130130 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Jul 08 '18 at 18:31 |
| Run Duration | 110 Seconds |
| Run User | CAN-User |
| Background CPU | 14% |
PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon W3520-$230
CPU0 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
|
58.6%
Above average
|
58% 96.1 Pts
|
31% 248 Pts
|
22% 351 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 460-$203
EVGA(3842 1370) 1GB
CLim: 720 MHz, MLim: 900 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35
|
13.3%
Very poor
|
12% 15.6 fps
|
15% 18.3 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$36
433GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC67
SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 49 55 88 50 117 MB/s
|
25.7%
Poor
|
32% 43.5 MB/s
|
128% 0.97 MB/s
| |
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical Z400 Workstation Builds (Compare 3,326 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: HP Z400 Workstation
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Xeon W3520Intel $230Bench 63%, 6,508 samples | 569x |
| Xeon W3550IntelBench 66%, 7,649 samples | 536x |
| Xeon W3565IntelBench 67%, 7,121 samples | 489x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| Quadro 2000NvidiaBench 6%, 15,855 samples | 273x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 156x |
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 137x |
| SSD |
|
|---|---|
| A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples | 136x |
| 850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples | 73x |
| A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples | 66x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 62% - Good | Total price: $258 |