Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 26.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot Drive	21.4% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (84%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 4000+ 2,693 User benchmarks, average bench 31% Socket AM2 , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	26.6% Poor	Memory 45.7 1-Core 20.7 2-Core 45.6 25% 37.3 Pts	4-Core 44.2 8-Core 55 6% 49.6 Pts	64-Core 54.8 3% 54.8 Pts
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 26.6% Great: 45%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
LDLC 120GB 1,255 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 83GB free (System drive) Firmware: Q0601B SusWrite @10s intervals: 46 46 35 37 39 39 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	21.4% Poor	Read 182 Write 61.6 Mixed 46.1 SusWrite 40.5 18% 82.5 MB/s	4K Read 10.6 4K Write 19.9 4K Mixed 6.9 35% 12.5 MB/s	DQ Read 19.3 DQ Write 34.4 DQ Mixed 13 14% 22.2 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 21.4% Great: 87%
Toshiba P300 3TB-$100 74,038 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 2TB free Firmware: MX6OACF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 42 30 32 35 33 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	58.8% Above average	Read 169 Write 149 Mixed 81.8 SusWrite 35.8 80% 109 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.5 118% 1 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 58.8% Great: 108%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x1GB 68,489 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 2 of 4 slots used 2GB DIMM DDR2 Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	14.8% Very poor	MC Read 5.3 MC Write 4.5 MC Mixed 5 14% 4.93 GB/s	SC Read 3.8 SC Write 4.4 SC Mixed 4.4 12% 4.2 GB/s	Latency 177 22% 177 ns
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 14.8% Great: 20%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 0%

Incomplete

Desktop 0%

Incomplete

Workstation 0%

Incomplete

CPU
Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 5600+AMDBench 39%, 3,286 samples	1x

GPU
GeForce 9400 GTNvidiaBench 1%, 12,718 samples	1x

RAM
6GBUnknownBench 25%, 111,301 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16