Asus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results


Gaming 94% Nuclear submarine	Desktop 98% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 72% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	107% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	337% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING (all builds)
Memory	12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170831
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 02 '18 at 20:49
Run Duration	271 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	8%

Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-8350K-$139 23,493 User benchmarks, average bench 82% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	88.3% Excellent	Memory 92 1-Core 136 2-Core 272 92% 167 Pts	4-Core 503 8-Core 412 63% 458 Pts	64-Core 475 29% 475 Pts
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 88.3% Great: 93%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195 1,082,454 User benchmarks, average bench 102% MSI(1462 3369) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2527 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 398.36 Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	107% Outstanding	Lighting 139 Reflection 155 Parallax 131 114% 142 fps	MRender 119 Gravity 139 Splatting 115 101% 124 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 107% Great: 110%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Mushkin Pilot NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$149 3,554 User benchmarks, average bench 221% 307GB free (System drive) Firmware: SVN105 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1316 1469 1440 1458 1512 1509 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	337% Outstanding	Read 2,448 Write 1534 Mixed 1,144 SusWrite 1,451 366% 1,644 MB/s	4K Read 64 4K Write 186 4K Mixed 92.7 314% 114 MB/s	DQ Read 1305 DQ Write 1,070 DQ Mixed 1,008 804% 1,128 MB/s
Poor: 148% ↑ This bench: 337% Great: 322%
SanDisk Ultra Plus 256GB-$139 17,545 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 59GB free Firmware: 10.03.00 SusWrite @10s intervals: 295 283 246 268 236 245 MB/s Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	92.1% Outstanding	Read 484 Write 338 Mixed 225 SusWrite 262 73% 327 MB/s	4K Read 30.2 4K Write 106 4K Mixed 37.8 150% 58.1 MB/s	DQ Read 306 DQ Write 182 DQ Mixed 130 128% 206 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 92.1% Great: 99%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 44GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 464 116 78 79 78 78 MB/s Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	117% Outstanding	Read 508 Write 488 Mixed 400 SusWrite 149 86% 386 MB/s	4K Read 49 4K Write 132 4K Mixed 67.6 231% 82.9 MB/s	DQ Read 382 DQ Write 343 DQ Mixed 357 269% 361 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 117% Great: 134%
Crucial MX500 1TB-$74 202,785 User benchmarks, average bench 106% 764GB free Firmware: M3CR020 SusWrite @10s intervals: 462 471 466 468 430 427 MB/s Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	129% Outstanding	Read 518 Write 472 Mixed 431 SusWrite 454 106% 469 MB/s	4K Read 41.2 4K Write 127 4K Mixed 60.4 207% 76.1 MB/s	DQ Read 386 DQ Write 342 DQ Mixed 304 244% 344 MB/s
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 129% Great: 125%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$60 67,711 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 1.5TB free Firmware: CC52 SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 131 133 131 133 132 MB/s Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	82.7% Excellent	Read 158 Write 128 Mixed 80.9 SusWrite 131 91% 124 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.7 129% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 82.7% Great: 96%
WD Elements 2TB 35,768 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 1.5TB free, PID 1048 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 92 90 91 92 91 MB/s Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	39.2% Below average	Read 90.4 Write 91.2 Mixed 53.6 SusWrite 90.9 110% 81.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.8 97% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 39.2% Great: 44%
WD Elements 1TB 51,914 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 870GB free, PID 1042 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 69 69 69 69 68 MB/s Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	27.4% Poor	Read 65.5 Write 64.8 Mixed 46.2 SusWrite 68.8 83% 61.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.6 53% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 27.4% Great: 43%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 16ATF2G64AZ-2G1B1 1x16GB 1,618 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 1 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	41.9% Average	MC Read 14.4 MC Write 14.3 MC Mixed 12 39% 13.6 GB/s	SC Read 13.8 SC Write 14.3 SC Mixed 13.9 40% 14 GB/s	Latency 64.1 62% 64.1 ns
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 41.9% Great: 44%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 4,328 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 93%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 91%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 85%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING - $135

CPU
Core i7-8700KIntel $193Bench 88%, 746,287 samples	1,520x
Core i5-8600KIntel $173Bench 91%, 264,837 samples	837x
Core i7-8700Intel $200Bench 87%, 349,567 samples	575x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	404x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	346x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	343x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	116x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	105x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	97x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	146x
DDR4 3000 2OZ 2x8GBAdataBench 87%, 25,457 samples	91x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	85x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 101% - Outstanding

Total price: $648

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16