Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive	26% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-7500-$89 149,467 User benchmarks, average bench 67% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	76% Very good	Memory 85.4 1-Core 105 2-Core 211 76% 134 Pts	4-Core 395 8-Core 339 50% 367 Pts	64-Core 387 24% 387 Pts
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 76% Great: 78%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
OCZ AGILITY3 60GB 14,293 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 31GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2.22 SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 42 49 54 59 57 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	26% Poor	Read 106 Write 37.2 Mixed 76.7 SusWrite 50.1 15% 67.5 MB/s	4K Read 7.2 4K Write 30.8 4K Mixed 19.8 53% 19.3 MB/s	DQ Read 64.5 DQ Write 8.1 DQ Mixed 47.2 32% 39.9 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 26% Great: 51%
SanDisk Gaming Xbox 360 16GB 213 User benchmarks, average bench 7% 11GB free, PID 5151 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.2 5.8 5.9 6 7.4 6 MB/s Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	7.06% Terrible	Read 19.8 Write 11.7 Mixed 13.3 SusWrite 6 16% 12.7 MB/s	4K Read 3.1 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 1.1 73% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 7.06% Great: 11%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 3000 C16 Series 2x4GB 13,047 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	60.5% Good	MC Read 20.6 MC Write 23.5 MC Mixed 19.1 60% 21.1 GB/s	SC Read 13.4 SC Write 21.2 SC Mixed 20.9 53% 18.5 GB/s	Latency 71.7 56% 71.7 ns
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 60.5% Great: 106%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 25%

Raft

Desktop 74%

Battleship

Workstation 21%

Surfboard

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C16 2x8GBCorsair $42Bench 76%, 105,447 samples	89x
HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GBKingstonBench 76%, 122,822 samples	84x
Ripjaws V DDR4 2400 C15 2x8GBG.SKILL $31Bench 71%, 98,777 samples	68x

Value: 98% - Outstanding

Total price: $413

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16