Asrock X370 Taichi

Performance Results


Gaming 86% Aircraft carrier	Desktop 88% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 85% Aircraft carrier


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	94.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	80.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock X370 Taichi (all builds)
Memory	13 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180417
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 25 '18 at 04:44
Run Duration	172 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	3%

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 1800X-$60 30,050 User benchmarks, average bench 72% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	85.4% Excellent	Memory 83.7 1-Core 117 2-Core 233 81% 145 Pts	4-Core 468 8-Core 864 80% 666 Pts	64-Core 1235 76% 1235 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 85.4% Great: 82%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Vega Frontier Edition-$1,000 1,949 User benchmarks, average bench 86% AMD(1002 6B76) CLim: 1727 MHz, MLim: 1115 MHz, Ram: 16GB, Driver: 18.6.1 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	94.7% Outstanding	Lighting 113 Reflection 90.8 Parallax 200 92% 135 fps	MRender 89.1 Gravity 138 Splatting 130 99% 119 fps
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 94.7% Great: 92%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$122 154,399 User benchmarks, average bench 110% 433GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 11569 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 594 (B1) Unknown 99 99 10 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 65 57 35 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 99 99 16 (EB) Unknown 99 99 378 (F1) Unknown 99 99 19478667553	102% Outstanding	Read 516 Write 411 Mixed 415 100% 448 MB/s	4K Read 41.9 4K Write 78.2 4K Mixed 46.2 164% 55.4 MB/s	DQ Read 42 DQ Write 218 DQ Mixed 24.6 50% 94.8 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 133%
Samsung 840 Evo 500GB-$150 68,337 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 221GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT0DB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 94 94 28981 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 2317 (B1) Unknown 86 86 162 (B3) Unknown 100 1 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 62 41 38 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 99 99 2 (EB) Unknown 99 99 1796 (F1) Unknown 99 99 76546257899	80.4% Excellent	Read 509 Write 351 Mixed 357 90% 406 MB/s	4K Read 41 4K Write 63.1 4K Mixed 20.8 122% 41.6 MB/s	DQ Read 40.7 DQ Write 91.2 DQ Mixed 19.7 28% 50.5 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 80.4% Great: 126%
Samsung MZ7PD480HAGM-000D3 480GB 160 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 93GB free Firmware: DXM02D1Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 95 95 21860 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1849 (B1) Unknown 98 98 71 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B4) Unknown 100 100 18304 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 67 47 33 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 1460 (F1) Unknown 99 99 24409412602	76.8% Very good	Read 523 Write 272 Mixed 409 89% 401 MB/s	4K Read 32.1 4K Write 85.5 4K Mixed 23.4 124% 47 MB/s	DQ Read 32.8 DQ Write 86.1 DQ Mixed 21.2 27% 46.7 MB/s
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 76.8% Great: 109%
Asus RAIDR Express PCIe 1,224 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 30GB free Firmware: MV.R Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing as expected (52^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value	87.9% Excellent	Read 768 Write 316 Mixed 394 108% 493 MB/s	4K Read 30.2 4K Write 59.1 4K Mixed 21.7 105% 37 MB/s	DQ Read 126 DQ Write 174 DQ Mixed 13.6 48% 105 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 87.9% Great: 101%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Flare X DDR4 3200 C14 2x8GB-$73 54,616 User benchmarks, average bench 98% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	115% Outstanding	MC Read 45.8 MC Write 41.8 MC Mixed 41.5 123% 43 GB/s	SC Read 24.1 SC Write 32.6 SC Mixed 30.2 83% 29 GB/s	Latency 74 54% 74 ns
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 115% Great: 129%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X370 Taichi Builds (Compare 632 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 90%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 88%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asrock X370 Taichi - $250

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	120x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $211Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	88x
Ryzen 7 1800XAMD $60Bench 72%, 30,050 samples	73x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	58x
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	51x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	44x

SSD
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 213%, 165,668 samples	30x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $90Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	27x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	22x

RAM
Flare X DDR4 3200 C14 2x8GBG.SKILL $73Bench 98%, 54,616 samples	39x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	23x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	19x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 70% - Very good

Total price: $1,046

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16