User System

Performance Results


Gaming 19% Surfboard	Desktop 78% Battleship	Workstation 16% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	21.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	34.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	ByteSpeed
Motherboard	Intel DQ67EP
Memory	11.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20121105
Uptime	17 Days
Run Date	Jun 22 '18 at 04:39
Run Duration	148 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	15%

PC Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319 147,533 User benchmarks, average bench 71% SKTH, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	70.7% Very good	Memory 89.2 1-Core 94.4 2-Core 183 72% 122 Pts	4-Core 292 8-Core 362 42% 327 Pts	64-Core 417 26% 417 Pts
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 70.7% Great: 83%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-$170 123,956 User benchmarks, average bench 20% Asus(1043 8422) 2GB CLim: 1241 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 390.77 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	21.6% Poor	Lighting 25 Reflection 25 Parallax 31.4 20% 27.1 fps	MRender 33.9 Gravity 29.5 Splatting 26.2 24% 29.9 fps
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 21.6% Great: 21%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel 540s Series 480GB 4,519 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 198GB free Firmware: LSF041C Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 114 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 29 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 100 100 12 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 42 48 115967262762 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 12 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (E1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 146253 (E2) Load-in time 100 100 0 (E3) Torque amplification count 100 100 0 (E4) Power-off retract count 100 100 0 (E8) Unknown 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 99 99 0 (F1) Unknown 100 100 146253 (F2) Unknown 100 100 139320 (F9) Unknown 100 100 4132 (FC) Unknown 100 100 11	65.5% Good	Read 514 Write 147 Mixed 193 62% 285 MB/s	4K Read 18.2 4K Write 46.3 4K Mixed 28 88% 30.8 MB/s	DQ Read 198 DQ Write 172 DQ Mixed 14.7 58% 129 MB/s
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 65.5% Great: 95%
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$35 176,713 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 79GB free (System drive) Firmware: 60AABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 95 95 241940584 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 64 64 -122217589343167 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 161 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 76 (B1) Unknown 0 0 98 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 33 45 85902295073 (C2) HDA temperature 33 45 85902295073 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 241940584 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 241940584 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 241940584 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 23289 (EA) Unknown 0 0 22617 (F1) Unknown 0 0 22617 (F2) Unknown 0 0 27380	34.8% Below average	Read 169 Write 144 Mixed 112 32% 142 MB/s	4K Read 13.5 4K Write 59.7 4K Mixed 6.88 61% 26.7 MB/s	DQ Read 19.4 DQ Write 65.5 DQ Mixed 6.73 16% 30.5 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 34.8% Great: 85%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.11 1.5TB-$88 40,945 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 262GB free Firmware: SD1B Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (51^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 115 99 96491441 (03) Spinup time 94 92 0 (04) Start/Stop count 89 89 11692 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 81 60 129393278 (09) Power-on hours count 41 41 52204 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 10 (0C) Power cycle count 99 37 1660 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 96 889072189659 (BD) vendor-specific 1 1 1039 (BE) vendor-specific 62 44 39344799782 (C2) HDA temperature 38 56 73014444070 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 54 27 96491441 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	57.3% Above average	Read 98.4 Write 101 Mixed 88.1 72% 96 MB/s	4K Read 0.51 4K Write 1.39 4K Mixed 0.32 83% 0.74 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 57.3% Great: 70%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99U5471-054.A00LF 2x8GB 9,823 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz Performing below potential (16^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	43.6% Average	MC Read 15.3 MC Write 14.9 MC Mixed 14.1 42% 14.8 GB/s	SC Read 11.3 SC Write 13 SC Mixed 13.2 36% 12.5 GB/s	Latency 68.2 59% 68.2 ns
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 43.6% Great: 61%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

User System

Performance Results

PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Feedback

PC Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)