Asus P8Z77-V PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 26% Raft	Desktop 84% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 22% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	27.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	85% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus P8Z77-V PRO (all builds)
Memory	25.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit Farben, , 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120605
Uptime	1.3 Days
Run Date	Jun 19 '18 at 16:43
Run Duration	258 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	5%

PC Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3770K-$175 165,979 User benchmarks, average bench 72% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	80% Very good	Memory 89.5 1-Core 113 2-Core 221 80% 141 Pts	4-Core 382 8-Core 540 58% 461 Pts	64-Core 556 34% 556 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 80% Great: 83%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-Ti-$362 42,960 User benchmarks, average bench 26% Gigabyte(1458 3556) 2GB CLim: 1228 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 398.11 Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	27.4% Poor	Lighting 33.1 Reflection 32.4 Parallax 41.6 27% 35.7 fps	MRender 40 Gravity 38.2 Splatting 27.8 28% 35.4 fps
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 27.4% Great: 29%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 830 Series 960GB 558GB free Firmware: X35510RL Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 253 100 2577 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1226 (A5) Unknown 100 100 12888702997 (A6) Unknown 100 100 0 (A7) Unknown 100 100 21 (A8) Unknown 100 100 2 (A9) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 100 100 37 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 72 41 176094511132 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 1 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 12884901891 (E8) Unknown 100 100 100 (E9) Unknown 100 100 512 (EA) Unknown 100 100 888 (F1) Unknown 253 253 542 (F2) Unknown 253 253 1685 (F4) Unknown 0 100 0	62% Good	Read 469 Write 206 Mixed 187 63% 287 MB/s	4K Read 22.5 4K Write 36.6 4K Mixed 24.5 85% 27.8 MB/s	DQ Read 157 DQ Write 38.8 DQ Mixed 54.1 51% 83.4 MB/s

Samsung 840 Evo 500GB-$150 68,337 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 78GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT0BB0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 5200 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 2329 (B1) Unknown 98 98 23 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 67 60 33 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 88 (F1) Unknown 99 99 41097746342	85% Excellent	Read 502 Write 349 Mixed 355 89% 402 MB/s	4K Read 35.2 4K Write 49.1 4K Mixed 24.6 111% 36.3 MB/s	DQ Read 320 DQ Write 152 DQ Mixed 89.7 105% 187 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 85% Great: 126%
Seagate Expansion 2TB 49,966 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 1.5TB free Firmware: 0637 Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	60.2% Good	Read 101 Write 109 Mixed 111 81% 107 MB/s	4K Read 0.47 4K Write 1.72 4K Mixed 0.31 86% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 60.2% Great: 67%
ASMT 2115 1TB 4,577 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 737GB free, PID 1153 Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	60.5% Good	Read 144 Write 146 Mixed 81.8 154% 124 MB/s	4K Read 1.24 4K Write 2.43 4K Mixed 0.32 98% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 60.5% Great: 167%
Seagate Slim BK 500GB 105 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 366GB free, PID a014 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	31.2% Below average	Read 82.2 Write 76.6 Mixed 62.7 93% 73.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.78 4K Mixed 0.18 35% 0.49 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 31.2% Great: 42%
SanDisk Ultra Flair USB 3.0 16GB-$8 10,598 User benchmarks, average bench 22% 11GB free, PID 5591 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	16.9% Very poor	Read 31 Write 17.5 Mixed 21 28% 23.2 MB/s	4K Read 4.78 4K Write 2.41 4K Mixed 1.31 144% 2.83 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 16.9% Great: 32%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905403-559.A00LF KHX1600C10D3/8G 9905403-559.A00LF KHX1600C10D3/8G 32GB 29 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	48.4% Average	MC Read 17.2 MC Write 16.1 MC Mixed 14.9 46% 16.1 GB/s	SC Read 14.7 SC Write 18.2 SC Mixed 16.3 47% 16.4 GB/s	Latency 67.9 59% 67.9 ns
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 48.4% Great: 63%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P8Z77-V PRO Builds (Compare 2,080 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 39%

Jet ski

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 32%

Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus P8Z77-V PRO - $400

CPU
Core i7-3770KIntel $175Bench 72%, 165,979 samples	826x
Core i5-3570KIntel $136Bench 68%, 185,516 samples	553x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	316x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	139x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	138x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	125x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	113x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	72x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	69x

RAM
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 34,385 samples	61x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 20,667 samples	59x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBCorsairBench 54%, 43,127 samples	42x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $855

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16