Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 48% Yacht	Desktop 81% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 47% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	53.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus PRIME X370-PRO (all builds)
Memory	10.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180419
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 16 '18 at 16:44
Run Duration	602 Seconds
Run User	AUT-User
Background CPU	4%

Watch Gameplay: 480 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X-$211 66,470 User benchmarks, average bench 71% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	76.2% Very good	Memory 76.9 1-Core 107 2-Core 215 74% 133 Pts	4-Core 405 8-Core 764 70% 584 Pts	64-Core 1,123 70% 1,123 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 76.2% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 480-$75 261,163 User benchmarks, average bench 46% Sapphire(174B E347) CLim: 1342 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 18.5.2 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	53.7% Above average	Lighting 67.1 Reflection 68.7 Parallax 85.2 55% 73.6 fps	MRender 70.5 Gravity 64.8 Splatting 57.2 52% 64.2 fps
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 53.7% Great: 53%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 480GB-$250 15,510 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 228GB free Firmware: 608ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (78^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 95 95 5675854 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 96 96 -69217692938213 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 616 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 93 (B1) Unknown 0 0 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 33 46 55837589537 (C2) HDA temperature 33 46 55837589537 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 5675854 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 5675854 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 5675854 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 100 100 98784247808 (E9) Unknown 0 0 5891 (EA) Unknown 0 0 5975 (F1) Unknown 0 0 5975 (F2) Unknown 0 0 6912 (F4) Unknown 100 100 1572874	59.4% Above average	Read 499 Write 254 Mixed 336 80% 363 MB/s	4K Read 20.8 4K Write 20.2 4K Mixed 17.1 64% 19.4 MB/s	DQ Read 111 DQ Write 81.6 DQ Mixed 49.9 50% 80.7 MB/s
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 59.4% Great: 65%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 161GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 5323 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 747 (B1) Unknown 98 98 33 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 60 52 40 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 96 (F1) Unknown 99 99 16841536944
Poor: 72% Great: 124%
Seagate Barracuda Green 2TB-$78 81,608 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 1.5TB free Firmware: CC45 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 117 98 592 (03) Spinup time 93 92 0 (04) Start/Stop count 94 94 6649 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 82 60 4488233979 (09) Power-on hours count 74 74 23479 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1788 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 1 1 101 (BC) Unknown 100 98 85 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 68 49 538902560 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 265 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 97 97 6900 (C2) HDA temperature 32 51 47244640288 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 22 9 592 (C5) Current pending sector count 97 97 248 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 97 97 248 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 3 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -30472792947933 (F1) Unknown 100 253 2803275377 (F2) Unknown 100 253 758180443	61.8% Good	Read 112 Write 103 Mixed 87.2 76% 101 MB/s	4K Read 0.71 4K Write 0.87 4K Mixed 0.62 115% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 61.8% Great: 75%
Kingston DataTraveler R3.0 USB 3.0 16GB-$15 505 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 15GB free, PID 168e Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	20.1% Poor	Read 67.8 Write 26.3 Mixed 36.4 48% 43.5 MB/s	4K Read 10.9 4K Write 0.64 4K Mixed 0.66 85% 4.08 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 20.1% Great: 40%
Kingston DataTraveler R3.0 USB 3.0 16GB-$15 505 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 15GB free, PID 168e Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	21.2% Poor	Read 68.1 Write 29.4 Mixed 29.6 47% 42.4 MB/s	4K Read 10.9 4K Write 0.75 4K Mixed 0.19 72% 3.96 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 21.2% Great: 40%
Generic Flash Disk 2GB 6,669 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 2GB free, PID 6387 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	4.99% Terrible	Read 19.1 Write 4.3 Mixed 7.96 11% 10.5 MB/s	4K Read 5.32 4K Write 0.006 4K Mixed 0.009 20% 1.78 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 4.99% Great: 8%
8GB 349 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 1GB free, PID 1000 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	6.77% Terrible	Read 26.9 Write 5.14 Mixed 8.66 13% 13.6 MB/s	4K Read 7.33 4K Write 0.005 4K Mixed 0.004 28% 2.45 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 6.77% Great: 7%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB-$45 606,405 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 3000 MHz clocked @ 1500 MHz Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	93.3% Outstanding	MC Read 38.7 MC Write 31.3 MC Mixed 32.1 97% 34 GB/s	SC Read 22.7 SC Write 34.5 SC Mixed 25.7 79% 27.6 GB/s	Latency 86.5 46% 86.5 ns
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 93.3% Great: 104%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME X370-PRO Builds (Compare 2,536 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 74%

Battleship

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 72%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	420x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $211Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	326x
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	204x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	217x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	194x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	189x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	94x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $90Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	89x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	75x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	161x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	123x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	57x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 88% - Excellent

Total price: $644

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

Feedback

PC Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)