Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive	46.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8350-$130 313,196 User benchmarks, average bench 61% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4 GHz Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	68.1% Good	Memory 90.3 1-Core 70.9 2-Core 134 61% 98.3 Pts	4-Core 249 8-Core 432 41% 341 Pts	64-Core 440 27% 440 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 68.1% Great: 68%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Q-90 90GB 256 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 44GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.00 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (39^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 1 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 10 (A0) Unknown 100 100 0 (A1) Unknown 100 100 0 (A3) Unknown 100 100 0 (A4) Unknown 100 100 93 (A5) Unknown 100 100 1 (A6) Unknown 100 100 0 (A7) Unknown 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 9 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 33 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 13 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (F1) Unknown 100 100 490 (F2) Unknown 100 100 290	46.6% Average	Read 278 Write 279 Mixed 198 56% 252 MB/s	4K Read 19.8 4K Write 43.3 4K Mixed 4.3 58% 22.5 MB/s	DQ Read 23.5 DQ Write 74.2 DQ Mixed 5.2 17% 34.3 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 46.6% Great: 77%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 8GBH2X04F1AA2 2x8GB 412 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 800 MHz Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	49% Average	MC Read 20.3 MC Write 15.2 MC Mixed 17.2 50% 17.6 GB/s	SC Read 10.6 SC Write 8.5 SC Mixed 12 30% 10.4 GB/s	Latency 66.8 60% 66.8 ns
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 49% Great: 55%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 22%

Surfboard

Desktop 67%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 18%

Surfboard

RAM
HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBKingstonBench 46%, 10,715 samples	149x
HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 2x4GBKingstonBench 41%, 7,567 samples	68x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 2x4GBKingstonBench 39%, 4,786 samples	62x

Value: 80% - Very good

Total price: $366

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16