Gigabyte GA-Z370 AORUS Gaming 3

Performance Results


Gaming 126% UFO	Desktop 95% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 116% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	136% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	93.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-Z370 AORUS Gaming 3 (all builds)
Memory	28.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180301
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 12 '18 at 11:19
Run Duration	251 Seconds
Run User	NZL-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing as expected (57^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8700K-$193 746,287 User benchmarks, average bench 88% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	92.8% Outstanding	Memory 93.8 1-Core 134 2-Core 271 92% 166 Pts	4-Core 493 8-Core 839 81% 666 Pts	64-Core 1,022 63% 1,022 Pts
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 92.8% Great: 100%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% Gigabyte(1458 3751) CLim: 2037 MHz, MLim: 2808 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 398.11 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	136% Outstanding	Lighting 193 Reflection 207 Parallax 203 158% 201 fps	MRender 129 Gravity 186 Splatting 127 119% 148 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 136% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$122 154,399 User benchmarks, average bench 110% 645GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	93.1% Outstanding	Read 505 Write 395 Mixed 408 97% 436 MB/s	4K Read 30.8 4K Write 71.8 4K Mixed 36.5 132% 46.4 MB/s	DQ Read 227 DQ Write 144 DQ Mixed 80.8 88% 151 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 93.1% Great: 133%
WD Black 4TB (2012)-$323 4,113 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 846GB free Firmware: 01.01L01 Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	65.6% Good	Read 112 Write 117 Mixed 136 92% 121 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2.85 4K Mixed 0.35 113% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 65.6% Great: 93%
Lexar JumpDrive S25 USB 3.0 64GB-$13 1,615 User benchmarks, average bench 22% 43GB free, PID a838 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	22.7% Poor	Read 89.5 Write 29.1 Mixed 63.7 70% 60.8 MB/s	4K Read 3.96 4K Write 0.78 4K Mixed 0.61 62% 1.78 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 22.7% Great: 38%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 2666 C15 2x16GB 1,843 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	86.6% Excellent	MC Read 32 MC Write 33.4 MC Mixed 26 87% 30.5 GB/s	SC Read 20.5 SC Write 35.6 SC Mixed 25.4 78% 27.2 GB/s	Latency 60.2 66% 60.2 ns
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 86.6% Great: 96%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-Z370 AORUS Gaming 3 Builds (Compare 1,627 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 94%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 96%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 86%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z370 AORUS Gaming 3

CPU
Core i7-8700KIntel $193Bench 88%, 746,287 samples	628x
Core i5-8600KIntel $173Bench 91%, 264,837 samples	311x
Core i7-8700Intel $200Bench 87%, 349,567 samples	222x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	147x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	140x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	119x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	63x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $75Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	51x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $139Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	43x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $48Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	72x
Aegis DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 82%, 163,634 samples	28x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $34Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	27x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 115% - Outstanding

Total price: $531

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16