Asus X99-PRO/USB 3.1

Performance Results


Gaming 60% Gunboat	Desktop 97% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 55% Gunboat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (88th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 12 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	54.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus X99-PRO/USB 3.1 (all builds)
Memory	12 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit cores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170331
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 10 '18 at 23:03
Run Duration	252 Seconds
Run User	PRT-User
Background CPU	0%

Watch Gameplay: 480 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130 101,694 User benchmarks, average bench 77% SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	97.9% Outstanding	Memory 98 1-Core 133 2-Core 264 93% 165 Pts	4-Core 526 8-Core 865 85% 696 Pts	64-Core 1,072 66% 1,072 Pts
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 97.9% Great: 88%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 480-$75 261,163 User benchmarks, average bench 46% Sapphire(174B E347) CLim: 1342 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 18.1.1 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	54.6% Above average	Lighting 68.5 Reflection 71.3 Parallax 86.1 56% 75.3 fps	MRender 70.5 Gravity 66 Splatting 57.8 52% 64.8 fps
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 54.6% Great: 53%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 49GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 6953 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 2208 (B1) Unknown 97 97 58 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 64 51 36 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 99 99 66 (EB) Unknown 99 99 747 (F1) Unknown 99 99 24756756391
Poor: 72% Great: 124%
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$38 339,020 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 24GB free Firmware: BBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (80^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 95 95 4067249 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 40286793238897 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 335 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 96 (B1) Unknown 0 0 98 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 28 46 60132556828 (C2) HDA temperature 28 46 60132556828 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 4067249 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 4067249 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 4067249 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 97 97 1 (E9) Unknown 0 0 416 (EA) Unknown 0 0 434 (F1) Unknown 0 0 434 (F2) Unknown 0 0 585 (F4) Unknown 98 98 196673597	63.8% Good	Read 522 Write 117 Mixed 196 60% 278 MB/s	4K Read 24 4K Write 105 4K Mixed 13.3 109% 47.6 MB/s	DQ Read 79.5 DQ Write 126 DQ Mixed 26 41% 77 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 63.8% Great: 73%
WD WD5000AVVS-63H0B1 500GB 11,411 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 1TB free Firmware: 0A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 975 (03) Spinup time 150 145 3466 (04) Start/Stop count 94 94 6352 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 61 61 28964 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 3631 (C0) Power-off retract count 197 197 2475 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 65 65 405747 (C2) HDA temperature 116 83 27 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 199 1 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 1 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	47.6% Average	Read 79.4 Write 86.3 Mixed 60.6 56% 75.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.39 4K Write 1.84 4K Mixed 0.22 74% 0.82 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 47.6% Great: 51%
silicon -power 4GB 91 User benchmarks, average bench 7% 0GB free, PID 1f23 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	7.34% Terrible	Read 28.1 Write 7.21 Mixed 13.7 17% 16.3 MB/s	4K Read 7 4K Write 0.02 4K Mixed 0.009 27% 2.34 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 7.34% Great: 9%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3000 C15 4x4GB 40 User benchmarks, average bench 99% 4 of 8 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 2933 MHz clocked @ 3000 MHz Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	137% Outstanding	MC Read 53.9 MC Write 56.1 MC Mixed 48.9 151% 53 GB/s	SC Read 20.5 SC Write 24.8 SC Mixed 28.4 70% 24.6 GB/s	Latency 46.3 86% 46.3 ns
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 137% Great: 127%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X99-PRO/USB 3.1 Builds (Compare 486 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 64%

Destroyer

Desktop 81%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 57%

Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus X99-PRO/USB 3.1 - $394

CPU
Core i7-5820KIntel $130Bench 77%, 101,694 samples	228x
Core i7-5930KIntel $70Bench 80%, 34,039 samples	103x
Core i7-6800KIntel $103Bench 81%, 50,196 samples	53x

GPU
GTX 980-TiNvidia $560Bench 79%, 214,030 samples	40x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	39x
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	38x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	22x
950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsung $625Bench 223%, 54,978 samples	18x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	11x

RAM
4x8GBUnknownBench 70%, 41,916 samples	15x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C14 4x8GBCorsair $140Bench 87%, 4,858 samples	13x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	13x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 43% - Average

Total price: $1,178

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16