Asus ROG STRIX X370-F GAMING

Performance Results


Gaming 87% Aircraft carrier	Desktop 89% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 88% Aircraft carrier


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	94.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	45.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus ROG STRIX X370-F GAMING (all builds)
Memory	12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180420
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jun 01 '18 at 21:23
Run Duration	171 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 1800X-$60 30,050 User benchmarks, average bench 72% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	86.9% Excellent	Memory 83.4 1-Core 123 2-Core 240 83% 149 Pts	4-Core 485 8-Core 965 86% 725 Pts	64-Core 1,331 82% 1,331 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 86.9% Great: 82%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX Vega-64-$400 91,676 User benchmarks, average bench 87% AMD(1002 6B76) CLim: 1602 MHz, MLim: 1050 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 18.5.2 Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	94.3% Outstanding	Lighting 118 Reflection 83.8 Parallax 171 96% 124 fps	MRender 83.5 Gravity 125 Splatting 119 91% 109 fps
Poor: 77% ↑ This bench: 94.3% Great: 94%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 750 EVO 500GB 31,052 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 391GB free Firmware: MAT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 3645 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1634 (B1) Unknown 95 95 23 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 69 54 31 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 98 98 1998 (EB) Unknown 99 99 156 (F1) Unknown 99 99 13420451098	77.7% Very good	Read 478 Write 270 Mixed 273 75% 341 MB/s	4K Read 40.2 4K Write 56.7 4K Mixed 28.2 127% 41.7 MB/s	DQ Read 37.1 DQ Write 144 DQ Mixed 57.5 54% 79.5 MB/s
Poor: 77% ↑ This bench: 77.7% Great: 123%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 333GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 8930 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 2557 (B1) Unknown 99 99 7 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 99 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 69 57 31 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 119 (F1) Unknown 99 99 7810873873	103% Outstanding	Read 515 Write 411 Mixed 421 100% 449 MB/s	4K Read 43.6 4K Write 85.8 4K Mixed 36.7 158% 55.4 MB/s	DQ Read 215 DQ Write 214 DQ Mixed 25.1 71% 151 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 103% Great: 134%
SanDisk SSD Plus 240GB-$28 133,640 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 214GB free Firmware: 0 Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	52.5% Above average	Read 402 Write 343 Mixed 388 84% 378 MB/s	4K Read 15.1 4K Write 38.1 4K Mixed 5.82 50% 19.7 MB/s	DQ Read 15.1 DQ Write 34.2 DQ Mixed 8.03 11% 19.1 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 52.5% Great: 86%
Corsair Force 3 120GB-$109 22,358 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 80GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.3.3 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (46^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 88 88 8583349 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 77 77 -48773648592953 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 4050 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 106 (B1) Unknown 0 0 7 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 30 30 128850984990 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 8583349 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 8583349 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 8583349 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 97 97 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 25808 (EA) Unknown 0 0 21698 (F1) Unknown 0 0 21698 (F2) Unknown 0 0 41578	45.9% Average	Read 193 Write 92.1 Mixed 117 30% 134 MB/s	4K Read 24.2 4K Write 77.8 4K Mixed 14.6 97% 38.9 MB/s	DQ Read 93.5 DQ Write 109 DQ Mixed 8.94 32% 70.6 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 45.9% Great: 61%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$55 215,644 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	104% Outstanding	MC Read 42.7 MC Write 37.8 MC Mixed 33 108% 37.8 GB/s	SC Read 24.7 SC Write 40.5 SC Mixed 28.3 89% 31.2 GB/s	Latency 74.5 54% 74.5 ns
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 104% Great: 107%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ROG STRIX X370-F GAMING Builds (Compare 940 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 81%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 81%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 79%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X370-F GAMING

CPU
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $210Bench 76%, 159,077 samples	129x
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	115x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $211Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	96x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	94x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	68x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	60x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	37x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	32x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	29x

RAM
Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $55Bench 84%, 215,644 samples	57x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	36x
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	27x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 94% - Outstanding

Total price: $536

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16