Performance Results


Gaming 66% Battle cruiser	Desktop 106% UFO	Workstation 62% Destroyer


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 104%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics	56.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	249% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asrock Z370 Professional Gaming i7 (all builds)
Memory	13.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180322
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 22 '18 at 12:43
Run Duration	105 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8700K-$193 746,287 User benchmarks, average bench 88% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.65 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	104% Outstanding	Memory 98 1-Core 150 2-Core 300 101% 183 Pts	4-Core 596 8-Core 961 95% 778 Pts	64-Core 1,239 77% 1,239 Pts
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 104% Great: 100%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200 834,238 User benchmarks, average bench 49% EVGA(3842 3978) CLim: 1531 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 397.64 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	56.5% Above average	Lighting 71.6 Reflection 72.6 Parallax 69.5 58% 71.2 fps	MRender 74.4 Gravity 65.8 Splatting 56.8 53% 65.7 fps
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 56.5% Great: 54%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 165,668 User benchmarks, average bench 213% 244GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	249% Outstanding	Read 2,111 Write 1,425 Mixed 1,264 354% 1,600 MB/s	4K Read 52.5 4K Write 110 4K Mixed 52.1 204% 71.5 MB/s	DQ Read 383 DQ Write 299 DQ Mixed 151 165% 278 MB/s
Poor: 153% ↑ This bench: 249% Great: 254%
OCZ Vector 150 240GB-$246 1,607 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 158GB free Firmware: 1.2 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 0 0 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 14906 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 2909 (AB) Unknown 80 80 85834576 (AE) Unknown 100 100 891 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (D0) Spin buzz 100 100 359 (D2) Unknown 100 100 15 (E0) Load friction 100 100 1 (E9) Unknown 89 89 89 (F1) Unknown 100 100 26135 (F2) Unknown 100 100 21991 (F9) Unknown 100 100 1216415952	75.6% Very good	Read 378 Write 349 Mixed 364 81% 363 MB/s	4K Read 22.1 4K Write 67.4 4K Mixed 25.5 102% 38.3 MB/s	DQ Read 219 DQ Write 147 DQ Mixed 97.3 96% 155 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 75.6% Great: 110%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance RGB DDR4 3600 C18 2x8GB-$248 5,582 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	106% Outstanding	MC Read 40.8 MC Write 41.9 MC Mixed 28 105% 36.9 GB/s	SC Read 24.3 SC Write 46.2 SC Mixed 33.3 99% 34.6 GB/s	Latency 46.2 86% 46.2 ns
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 106% Great: 112%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 112%

UFO

Desktop 96%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 103%

UFO

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	37x
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	27x
UHD Graphics 630 (Desktop Coffee Lake i5 i7)IntelBench 5%, 147,588 samples	20x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	18x
WDS100T1X0E-00AFY0 1TBBench 430%, 44,185 samples	12x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $107Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	12x

RAM
F4 DDR4 4266 C19 2x8GBG.SKILLBench 93%, 3,530 samples	17x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	9x
HyperX DDR4 4266 C19 2x8GBKingstonBench 98%, 520 samples	7x

Value: 77% - Very good

Total price: $773

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16