Asus 970 PRO GAMING/AURA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 84%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 45%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including moderate gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.7%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics122% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive50.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
Run History
MotherboardAsus 970 PRO GAMING/AURA  (all builds)
Memory28 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160516
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateMay 17 '18 at 01:36
Run Duration176 Seconds
Run User ARG-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
AMD FX-8320-$100
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
50.7% Above average
SC Int 80.3
SC Float 64.9
SC Mixed 71.3
58% 72.2 Pts
QC Int 263
QC Float 226
QC Mixed 242
55% 244 Pts
MC Int 442
MC Float 382
MC Mixed 438
63% 421 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 50.7%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$550
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 397.31
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
122% Outstanding
Lighting 326
Reflection 386
Parallax 443
114% 385 fps
MRender 232
Gravity 397
Splatting 247
128% 292 fps
Poor: 87%
This bench: 122%
Great: 142%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$65
51GB free
Firmware: 603ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
SYSTEM NCQ 4KALIGNED SSD TRIM S.M.A.R.T
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
50.3% Above average
Read 430
Write 108
Mixed 150
50% 229 MB/s
4K Read 22
4K Write 58.7
4K Mixed 10.3
78% 30.3 MB/s
DQ Read 81.9
DQ Write 113
DQ Mixed 29.2
41% 74.6 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 50.3%
Great: 63%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$67
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
NCQ !4KALIGNED S.M.A.R.T
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
48.8% Average
Read 94.9
Write 74.8
Mixed 93.1
66% 87.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.68
4K Write 1.71
4K Mixed 0.13
75% 0.84 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 48.8%
Great: 60%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$67
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
NCQ !4KALIGNED S.M.A.R.T
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
48.1% Average
Read 84.4
Write 83.1
Mixed 89.7
65% 85.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.55
4K Write 1.65
4K Mixed 0.19
75% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 48.1%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 1866 MHz clocked @ 933 MHz
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
51.4% Above average
MC Read 22
MC Write 14.4
MC Mixed 18.4
52% 18.3 GB/s
SC Read 11.2
SC Write 9
SC Mixed 14.7
33% 11.6 GB/s
Latency 64.1
62% 64.1 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 51.4%
Great: 102%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical 970 PRO GAMING/AURA Builds (Compare 6,226 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 62%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 45%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asus 970 PRO GAMING/AURA - $143

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $632
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $170Nvidia GTX 1070 $447Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $95
Intel Core i7-8700K $320Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $296Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $140
Intel Core i7-7700K $290AMD RX 480 $330Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $163
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $180SanDisk Extreme 64GB $41
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $960SanDisk Extreme 32GB $30
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $60HyperX Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GB $226SanDisk Extreme 16GB $20
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback