Asus Q87M-E

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics4% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus Q87M-E  (all builds)
Memory5.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140513
Uptime1.9 Days
Run DateMar 11 '16 at 17:16
Run Duration190 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4570-$99
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
79.5% Very good
Memory 89.7
1-Core 107
2-Core 207
78% 134 Pts
4-Core 401
8-Core 402
54% 402 Pts
64-Core 401
25% 401 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 79.5%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)-$15
Asus(1043 8534) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4331
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
4% Terrible
Lighting 3.97
Reflection 6.85
Parallax 6.84
3% 5.89 fps
MRender 9.62
Gravity 2.33
Splatting 7.91
6% 6.62 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Expansion Desk 2TB
1TB free
Firmware: 0711
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
84.9% Excellent
Read 144
Write 150
Mixed 101
98% 132 MB/s
4K Read 0.65
4K Write 6.7
4K Mixed 0.6
218% 2.65 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 84.9%
Great: 104%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
752GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC49 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
99.2% Outstanding
Read 176
Write 169
Mixed 160
127% 168 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.11
4K Mixed 0.31
111% 1.11 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 99.2%
Great: 112%
WD Blue 250GB (2008)-$80
50GB free
Firmware: 12.01B01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
44% Average
Read 80.6
Write 72.2
Mixed 74.6
57% 75.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.61
4K Write 2.38
4K Mixed 0.43
117% 1.14 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 44%
Great: 61%
SanDisk Extreme USB 3.0 16GB-$17
15GB free, PID 5580
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
78.8% Very good
Read 226
Write 48.3
Mixed 72.3
114% 116 MB/s
4K Read 9.91
4K Write 10.8
4K Mixed 4.74
564% 8.47 MB/s
DQ Read 12.6
DQ Write 11.5
DQ Mixed 5.03
609% 9.71 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 78.8%
Great: 81%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (63rd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
50.5% Above average
MC Read 17.6
MC Write 18
MC Mixed 15.8
49% 17.1 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 18
SC Mixed 14.7
45% 15.7 GB/s
Latency 67.7
59% 67.7 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 50.5%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Q87M-E Builds (Compare 1,220 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus Q87M-E

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $380
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $290Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback