Asrock AB350 Gaming-ITX/ac

Performance Results


Gaming 76% Battleship	Desktop 83% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 71% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	88.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	88.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

Motherboard	Asrock AB350 Gaming-ITX/ac (all builds)
Memory	12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180108
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	May 01 '18 at 01:26
Run Duration	180 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	2%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (51^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 1600-$110 392,253 User benchmarks, average bench 70% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	79.6% Very good	Memory 78.8 1-Core 102 2-Core 233 76% 138 Pts	4-Core 433 8-Core 714 70% 573 Pts	64-Core 944 58% 944 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 79.6% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% Gigabyte(1458 3701) CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	88.7% Excellent	Lighting 112 Reflection 119 Parallax 111 91% 114 fps	MRender 96.1 Gravity 104 Splatting 105 84% 102 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 88.7% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 174GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 1921 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 230 (B1) Unknown 99 99 9 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 64 55 36 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 25 (F1) Unknown 99 99 5312470921	92.8% Outstanding	Read 514 Write 417 Mixed 422 100% 451 MB/s	4K Read 43 4K Write 83.9 4K Mixed 23.7 140% 50.2 MB/s	DQ Read 42.6 DQ Write 226 DQ Mixed 23.4 50% 97.2 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 92.8% Great: 124%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 119GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 14716 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1424 (B1) Unknown 99 99 16 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 64 58 36 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 464 (F1) Unknown 99 99 3610666886	88.9% Excellent	Read 514 Write 419 Mixed 419 100% 451 MB/s	4K Read 42.2 4K Write 81 4K Mixed 23.7 137% 48.9 MB/s	DQ Read 41.4 DQ Write 76 DQ Mixed 22.9 28% 46.8 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 88.9% Great: 124%
Seagate FireCuda SSHD 2TB (2016)-$106 133,734 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 959GB free Firmware: CC41 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (45^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 114 99 83226592 (03) Spinup time 95 94 0 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1217 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 70 60 11906331 (09) Power-on hours count 91 91 8549 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 818 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 99 8590065668 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 69 63 521404447 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 355 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 99 99 3185 (C2) HDA temperature 31 40 60129542175 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 122028610823147 (F1) Unknown 100 253 9075708035 (F2) Unknown 100 253 447914594041	82.7% Excellent	Read 120 Write 168 Mixed 120 102% 136 MB/s	4K Read 0.47 4K Write 5.26 4K Mixed 0.5 173% 2.08 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 82.7% Great: 110%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB 4,255 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 901GB free, PID 0200 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	16.1% Very poor	Read 32.7 Write 28.1 Mixed 15.8 31% 25.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.48 4K Write 1.68 4K Mixed 0.19 66% 0.79 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 16.1% Great: 44%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CMK16GX4M2B3000C15 CMK8GX4M1A2666C16 16GB 23 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 2666, 2666 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	96.3% Outstanding	MC Read 37.9 MC Write 34.4 MC Mixed 32.8 100% 35 GB/s	SC Read 23.2 SC Write 35.9 SC Mixed 27.6 83% 28.9 GB/s	Latency 82.9 48% 82.9 ns
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 96.3% Great: 106%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical AB350 Gaming-ITX/ac Builds (Compare 452 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 43%

Speed boat

Desktop 77%

Battleship

Workstation 39%

Jet ski

Motherboard: Asrock AB350 Gaming-ITX/ac - $142

CPU
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	60x
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $150Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	51x
Ryzen 5 2400GAMD $135Bench 63%, 127,344 samples	39x

GPU
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	27x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	26x
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	25x

SSD
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $139Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	16x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	10x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	10x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	21x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $37Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	21x
TEAMGROUP-UD4-3000 2x8GBUnknownBench 82%, 74,390 samples	13x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 80% - Excellent

Total price: $561

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16