Asus TUF Z270 MARK 2

Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 75% Battleship	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	3.56% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	76.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus TUF Z270 MARK 2 (all builds)
Memory	12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	Цвета: 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170322
Uptime	1 Days
Run Date	Apr 24 '18 at 21:02
Run Duration	120 Seconds
Run User	BLR-User
Background CPU	5%

PC Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-7300-$97 1,568 User benchmarks, average bench 70% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	76.7% Very good	Memory 93.5 1-Core 127 2-Core 235 86% 152 Pts	4-Core 347 8-Core 352 47% 349 Pts	64-Core 346 21% 346 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 76.7% Great: 77%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 630 60,212 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Palit(1569 0F00) 2GB CLim: 780 MHz, MLim: 267 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.1 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	3.56% Terrible	Lighting 4.47 Reflection 5.54 Parallax 3.44 4% 4.48 fps	MRender 4.9 Gravity 4.57 Splatting 3.39 3% 4.29 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.56% Great: 5%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
HyperX Fury 240GB-$193 27,826 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 37GB free (System drive) Firmware: 60AABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (76^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 95 95 11401310 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 -66159676225381 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 512 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 69 (B1) Unknown 0 0 1 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 33 42 47247392801 (C2) HDA temperature 33 42 47247392801 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 11401310 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 11401310 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 11401310 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 95 95 81604378625 (E9) Unknown 0 0 16486 (EA) Unknown 0 0 3582 (F1) Unknown 0 0 3582 (F2) Unknown 0 0 3969 (F4) Unknown 100 100 3211280	76.2% Very good	Read 480 Write 242 Mixed 297 75% 340 MB/s	4K Read 25.5 4K Write 92.9 4K Mixed 18.5 112% 45.7 MB/s	DQ Read 191 DQ Write 240 DQ Mixed 60 89% 164 MB/s
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 76.2% Great: 84%
WD Blue 250GB (2007)-$20 41,230 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 8GB free Firmware: 01.01B01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 176 174 2191 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 492 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 73 73 20014 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 95 95 5339 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 629 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 199 199 5339 (C2) HDA temperature 108 82 35 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	33.7% Below average	Read 60.5 Write 56.8 Mixed 82.6 51% 66.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.28 4K Write 1.56 4K Mixed 0.27 71% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 33.7% Great: 55%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX 2400 C15 1x16GB 13,141 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 1 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	47.3% Average	MC Read 16.3 MC Write 16.2 MC Mixed 14.2 44% 15.6 GB/s	SC Read 13.9 SC Write 16.7 SC Mixed 15.6 44% 15.4 GB/s	Latency 60.9 66% 60.9 ns
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 47.3% Great: 49%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF Z270 MARK 2 Builds (Compare 1,914 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 71%

Battleship

Desktop 90%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 61%

Destroyer

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z270 MARK 2 - $129

CPU
Core i7-7700KIntel $230Bench 84%, 712,312 samples	921x
Core i5-7600KIntel $184Bench 76%, 195,006 samples	324x
Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples	185x

GPU
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	269x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	219x
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	202x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $90Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	56x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $139Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	51x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	49x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	93x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	56x
DDR4 3000 2OZ 2x8GBAdataBench 87%, 25,457 samples	35x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 97% - Outstanding

Total price: $627

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16