HP Z400 Workstation

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 59% Gunboat	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	3.75% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 8GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

System	HP Z400 Workstation (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 0B4Ch
Memory	5.2 GB free of 8.00195 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20101029
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	Apr 21 '18 at 16:20
Run Duration	318 Seconds
Run User	CHE-User
Background CPU	7%

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon W3565 7,121 User benchmarks, average bench 67% CPU0 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	68.1% Good	Memory 83.2 1-Core 83.7 2-Core 164 65% 110 Pts	4-Core 307 8-Core 312 41% 310 Pts	64-Core 312 19% 312 Pts
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 68.1% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro FX 1800 6,394 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Nvidia(10DE 062C) 768MB Ram: 768MB, Driver: 342.0 Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	3.75% Terrible	Lighting 4.7 Reflection 3.81 Parallax 1.59 4% 3.37 fps	MRender 5.81 Gravity 3.33 Splatting 4.22 4% 4.45 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.75% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70 337,642 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 714GB free (System drive) Firmware: HP40 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 112 99 46314836 (03) Spinup time 95 94 0 (04) Start/Stop count 97 97 3190 (05) Reallocated sector count 99 99 63 (07) Seek error rate 84 60 308799450 (09) Power-on hours count 86 86 12674 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1593 (B4) Unknown 100 100 814903663 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 64 59 605880356 (C2) HDA temperature 36 41 81604378660 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 46 25 46314836 (C4) Reallocation count 99 99 63 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	54.1% Above average	Read 95.5 Write 92.8 Mixed 94.9 71% 94.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.77 4K Write 1.43 4K Mixed 0.51 115% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 54.1% Great: 68%
Generic- SD/MMC 16GB 77 User benchmarks, average bench 9% 15GB free, PID 0181 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	9.13% Terrible	Read 19.7 Write 12.3 Mixed 12.4 18% 14.8 MB/s	4K Read 3.44 4K Write 0.91 4K Mixed 0.49 60% 1.61 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 9.13% Great: 16%
General USB Flash Disk 4GB 2,276 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 1GB free, PID 1000 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	6.33% Terrible	Read 24.9 Write 6.51 Mixed 9.08 14% 13.5 MB/s	4K Read 5.45 4K Write 0.008 4K Mixed 0.01 21% 1.82 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 6.33% Great: 8%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown ID:80 CE M391B5673FH0-CH9 ID:80 2C 9KSF25672AZ-1G4M1 ID:80 CE M391B5673FH0-CH9 ID:80 2C 9KSF25672AZ-1G4M1 42GB 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 34816 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	35.8% Below average	MC Read 12.7 MC Write 11.4 MC Mixed 11.6 34% 11.9 GB/s	SC Read 10.3 SC Write 9.8 SC Mixed 11 30% 10.4 GB/s	Latency 74.9 53% 74.9 ns

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Z400 Workstation Builds (Compare 3,330 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 59%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: HP Z400 Workstation

CPU
Xeon W3520Intel $230Bench 63%, 6,508 samples	569x
Xeon W3550IntelBench 66%, 7,649 samples	537x
Xeon W3565IntelBench 67%, 7,121 samples	490x

GPU
Quadro 2000NvidiaBench 6%, 15,855 samples	273x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	157x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	137x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	136x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	73x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	66x

RAM
ID:80 AD HMT125U7TFR8C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT125U7TFR8C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT125U7TFR8C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT125U7TFR8C-H9 42GBUnknownBench 37%, 128 samples	22x
ID:80 AD HMT351U7BFR8C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT351U7BFR8C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT351U7BFR8C-H9 46GBUnknownBench 45%, 108 samples	18x
ID:80 CE M391B5673FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M391B5673FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M391B5673FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M391B5673FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M391B5673FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M391B5673FH0-CH9 46GBUnknownBench 46%, 280 samples	16x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $258

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16