Asrock X370 Taichi

Performance Results


Gaming 62% Destroyer	Desktop 98% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 62% Destroyer


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	58.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	244% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asrock X370 Taichi (all builds)
Memory	13.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180302
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 19 '18 at 21:08
Run Duration	217 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	5%

PC Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$210 159,077 User benchmarks, average bench 76% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	91.8% Outstanding	Memory 93.6 1-Core 129 2-Core 258 90% 160 Pts	4-Core 483 8-Core 894 82% 689 Pts	64-Core 1,416 88% 1,416 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 91.8% Great: 89%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 290-$399 68,699 User benchmarks, average bench 46% Sapphire(174B E285) CLim: 1120 MHz, MLim: 1400 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 18.2.1 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	58.9% Above average	Lighting 73.2 Reflection 65.8 Parallax 95.3 60% 78.1 fps	MRender 63.4 Gravity 59 Splatting 83 58% 68.4 fps
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 58.9% Great: 50%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk SD8SN8U-256G-1006 256GB 12,432 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 230GB free Firmware: X4120006 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 821 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 130 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 100 100 74 (B0) Unknown 100 100 2176 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 6967 (C2) HDA temperature 31 61 4002847 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 100 100 0 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 34360262656 (F1) Unknown 100 100 8245 (F2) Unknown 100 100 7788 (F3) Unknown 100 100 9439 (F4) Unknown 0 100 0 (F9) Unknown 100 100 16	89.1% Excellent	Read 502 Write 480 Mixed 453 107% 478 MB/s	4K Read 32.3 4K Write 72.4 4K Mixed 25.4 120% 43.4 MB/s	DQ Read 31.5 DQ Write 143 DQ Mixed 15.5 33% 63.3 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 89.1% Great: 92%
Samsung PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB 99,566 User benchmarks, average bench 177% 182GB free (System drive) Firmware: 4L7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	244% Outstanding	Read 2,793 Write 1,129 Mixed 1,301 381% 1,741 MB/s	4K Read 49.9 4K Write 81.5 4K Mixed 50.8 184% 60.7 MB/s	DQ Read 179 DQ Write 135 DQ Mixed 26.6 55% 114 MB/s
Poor: 106% ↑ This bench: 244% Great: 236%
Kingdian S280-240GB 240GB 2,188 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 100GB free Firmware: O0803B5 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 41 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 2361 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1198 (A0) Unknown 100 100 11 (A1) Unknown 100 100 123 (A3) Unknown 100 100 17 (A4) Unknown 100 100 105777 (A5) Unknown 100 100 108 (A6) Unknown 100 100 6 (A7) Unknown 100 100 55 (A8) Unknown 100 100 1000 (A9) Unknown 100 100 95 (AF) Unknown 100 100 0 (B0) Unknown 100 100 0 (B1) Unknown 100 100 16 (B2) Unknown 100 100 12 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 91 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 40 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 158 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 158 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 23 (E8) Unknown 100 100 91 (F1) Unknown 100 100 294565 (F2) Unknown 100 100 440106 (F5) Unknown 100 100 423108	75.1% Very good	Read 517 Write 386 Mixed 422 98% 442 MB/s	4K Read 25.7 4K Write 60.1 4K Mixed 18.9 95% 34.9 MB/s	DQ Read 24.6 DQ Write 92 DQ Mixed 18.5 26% 45 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 75.1% Great: 100%
Hitachi HUA723020ALA641 2TB-$78 30,011 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 1.5TB free Firmware: MK7OA840 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (54^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 130 130 102 (03) Spinup time 116 116 42984931861 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 429 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 125 125 30 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 1052 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 224 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 385 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 385 (C2) HDA temperature 176 176 197569806370 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 1	66.4% Good	Read 118 Write 114 Mixed 105 84% 112 MB/s	4K Read 0.78 4K Write 1.96 4K Mixed 0.4 113% 1.05 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 66.4% Great: 82%
WD Green 1.5TB (2010)-$70 41,439 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 1.5TB free Firmware: 51.0AB51 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (44^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 227 170 3633 (04) Start/Stop count 97 97 3106 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 73 73 20198 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1910 (C0) Power-off retract count 199 199 1263 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 134 134 199707 (C2) HDA temperature 120 107 30 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	42.2% Average	Read 82 Write 65.1 Mixed 74 56% 73.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.53 4K Write 1.55 4K Mixed 0.18 71% 0.75 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 42.2% Great: 63%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70 337,642 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 592GB free Firmware: JC45 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (40^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 95 82 108888224 (03) Spinup time 100 100 0 (04) Start/Stop count 77 77 24253 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 62 60 365195707640 (09) Power-on hours count 47 47 47193 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1573 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 1 1 3764 (BC) Unknown 100 95 12885098510 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 69 46 521994271 (C2) HDA temperature 31 54 68719476767 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 29 19 108888224 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 2 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 2 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -56556129313098 (F1) Unknown 100 253 1254007074 (F2) Unknown 100 253 3549700178	51.6% Above average	Read 95.4 Write 84.6 Mixed 83.4 66% 87.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.58 4K Write 1.32 4K Mixed 0.32 84% 0.74 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 51.6% Great: 68%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 2x8GB 99,207 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 3600 MHz clocked @ 1800 MHz Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	103% Outstanding	MC Read 45.9 MC Write 39.5 MC Mixed 30.3 110% 38.6 GB/s	SC Read 29.8 SC Write 8.8 SC Mixed 33.1 68% 23.9 GB/s	Latency 60.8 66% 60.8 ns
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 103% Great: 110%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X370 Taichi Builds (Compare 632 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 90%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 88%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asrock X370 Taichi - $250

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	120x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $211Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	88x
Ryzen 7 1800XAMD $60Bench 72%, 30,050 samples	73x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	58x
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	51x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	44x

SSD
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 213%, 165,668 samples	30x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	27x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	22x

RAM
Flare X DDR4 3200 C14 2x8GBG.SKILL $73Bench 98%, 54,616 samples	39x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	23x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	19x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 70% - Very good

Total price: $1,046

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16