Asrock Z370 Taichi

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 88%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 147%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 125%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 120%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics74.8% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive276% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 4 months ago, 4 months ago, 4 months ago, 4 months ago, 4 months ago, 4 months ago, 4 months ago, 4 months ago, 4 months ago, 4 months ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
MotherboardAsrock Z370 Taichi  (all builds)
Memory13.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180322
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 17 '18 at 11:55
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
Intel Core i7-8700K-$370
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
120% Outstanding
SC Int 147
SC Float 153
SC Mixed 150
120% 150 Pts
QC Int 569
QC Float 610
QC Mixed 595
134% 591 Pts
MC Int 1,038
MC Float 1,264
MC Mixed 1,130
171% 1,144 Pts
Poor: 93%
This bench: 120%
Great: 124%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$230
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2052 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
74.8% Very good
Lighting 229
Reflection 211
Parallax 226
70% 222 fps
MRender 155
Gravity 221
Splatting 170
78% 182 fps
Poor: 65%
This bench: 74.8%
Great: 77%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$200
245GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4B6Q Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
276% Outstanding
Read 2,275
Write 1,870
Mixed 1,829
443% 1,991 MB/s
4K Read 52.4
4K Write 167
4K Mixed 41.5
221% 87.1 MB/s
DQ Read 55.2
DQ Write 198
DQ Mixed 171
118% 141 MB/s
Poor: 178%
This bench: 276%
Great: 352%
WD Green 240GB (2018)
223GB free
Firmware: UF300000 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
40% Average
Read 361
Write 167
Mixed 185
52% 237 MB/s
4K Read 19.2
4K Write 19.3
4K Mixed 3.47
44% 14 MB/s
DQ Read 108
DQ Write 42
DQ Mixed 3.59
21% 51.1 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 40%
Great: 53%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$38
893GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
97.6% Outstanding
Read 159
Write 181
Mixed 157
125% 166 MB/s
4K Read 1.32
4K Write 2.86
4K Mixed 0.35
146% 1.51 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 97.6%
Great: 106%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$157
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
96.6% Outstanding
MC Read 38.4
MC Write 36
MC Mixed 26.2
96% 33.5 GB/s
SC Read 23.2
SC Write 38.3
SC Mixed 31.1
88% 30.9 GB/s
Latency 47.5
84% 47.5 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 96.6%
Great: 109%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical Z370 Taichi Builds (Compare 1,816 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 128%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 127%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 117%
UFO

Motherboard: Asrock Z370 Taichi - $219

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 115% - Outstanding Total price: $1,583
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $370Nvidia GTX 1070 $344Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $100
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $150Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $230Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $110
Intel Core i7-7700K $339AMD RX 480 $280Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $135
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $145SanDisk Extreme 64GB $80
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $77G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $869SanDisk Extreme 32GB $30
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $38Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $155SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $11
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback