| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
| Graphics | 27.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (38%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
| Motherboard | Asrock FM2A55M-DGS (all builds) |
| Memory | 5.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz |
| Display | Цвета: 1600 x 900 - 32 Bit |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20161130 |
| Uptime | 0.2 Days |
| Run Date | Apr 17 '18 at 10:32 |
| Run Duration | 102 Seconds |
| Run User | RUS-User |
| Background CPU | 38% |
PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
48.5%
Average
|
34% 46.7 Pts
|
21% 164 Pts
|
10% 169 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD R9 270-$140
CLim: 975 MHz, MLim: 1400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 18.2.1
|
27.5%
Poor
|
28% 35.5 fps
|
26% 31.1 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
98.5%
Outstanding
|
123% 164 MB/s
|
100% 0.98 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Hynix HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 8GB
667, 667 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
30.8%
Below average
|
31% 11 GB/s
|
19% 6.53 GB/s
|
40% 99.1 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical FM2A55M-DGS Builds (Compare 34 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock FM2A55M-DGS
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| A10-5800K APU (2012 D.Tr)AMD $119Bench 50%, 18,312 samples | 16x |
| A4-5300 APUAMD $36Bench 40%, 7,032 samples | 6x |
| A10-5700 APU (2012 D.Tr)AMD $265Bench 48%, 6,606 samples | 3x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 7790AMDBench 20%, 8,590 samples | 12x |
| Radeon HD 7480DAMDBench 2%, 8,289 samples | 5x |
| GTX 660Nvidia $170Bench 20%, 123,956 samples | 2x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 55% - Above average | Total price: $147 |